Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
Checkout: http://SilencingChristians.com
How can a conservative agree with any part of the perverse homosexual agenda? I don’t understand how the conservatives could be confused about the issue.
“there was a lot of confusion about the issue of homosexual civil unions”
And there you have the destruction of America. Even the people on our side don’t give a rip what God says.
I believe the real conservative position on this is to look at basic rights and the laws and determine if the claims by the homosexuals are valid. The typical charge about marriage, and this is also used by otherwise conservative people in my experience, is that it is illegal discrimination to deny marriage to same-sex couples while allowing it for others. I say that if it is, then I am an MD.
Marriage is nothing but a defined institution which anyone can freely partake of if they simply meet the qualifications. Doctorates of Medicine are the same. If I want to be a doctor I have to go to school, take tests, apply for licenses and so on. But what about stupid people? Or the insane? Or people who do not believe in western medicine, or tests, or schooling? And of course there are the many, many poor people who cannot go to such schools. They are discriminated against under that system, just like gay people are in marriage.
Marriage is what it is. Being an MD is as well. And homosexuals can marry, and many have, only not usually to one of the same gender. They are not barred from the institution at all. It is simply not discrimatory to have standards. It is, though, if one bars those who actually meet the standards based on some other non-applicable criteria. But, that is not happening, and so there is no issue of individual rights being violated, which should satisfy any real conservative.
“More than half of the nearly 9,000 conservative activists at CPAC last week in Washington were under the age of 22. Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans for Truth About Homosexuality, says most of the young people he surveyed at CPAC were against the legalization of same-sex “marriage,”
That’s encouraging. There is nothing “true” about sodomy.
It’s always been obvious to me that the homosexual crowd were trying to slip in ‘civil unions’ specifically so they could then file lawsuits for ‘same-sex marriage’. This has been their agenda all along. They won’t be satisfied until our kids are forced to accept this sick lifestyle in their classrooms. The brazenness of the alternative lifestylers is mind-boggling.
What 2 adults do in the bedroom is not what I want the GOVERNMENT to worry about. I have a friend who is conservative and he is gay. He could make Rush look liberal. He would love to run for office, but he knows he can't be elected because he is GAY.
being gay doesn't make you a LIBERAL.
Hopefully the battle will clean out the stupid distractions and get a party committed to trimming back all forms of Big Government.
Reagan had it right. The Republican party to succeed and lead requires ALL three legs of the stool...
Financial Conservatism/Small Government
Moral Conservatism/Strong Values/Ethics
Strong Defense/Self Reliance
Government should get out of marriage altogether.
This thread is a two-fer....we get to trash libertarians and homosexuals for the price of one.
Most politicians say they’re for civil unions and against gay marriage.
I’m for gay marriage, and against civil unions. I don’t care what marriages churches recognize, but the state is obligated to keep a privileged position for Husband and Wife. Traditional families are the building blocks of any major civilization. I say this as an atheist, not a fundie.
Peanut Butter Jelly wid a Baseball Bat!
Just a thought.