Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Married gays in Mass. sue US for federal benefits
My Way News ^ | 3/3/09 | Dennis Lavoie

Posted on 03/03/2009 8:13:02 AM PST by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: mort56
And where does everyone think the Supremes will come down on this one?

My guess -- and that's all it is, a guess -- is that this SCOTUS will say it's up to the Congress whether or not to recognize gay marriage.

21 posted on 03/03/2009 8:47:51 AM PST by rmh47 (Go Kats! - Got Seven? [NRA Life Member])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

From the beginning of this movement to allow gays to marry each other it was obvious it was not about “love and committment,” but about MONEY! They tried to fool the public into having an emotional reaction to their “plight” and desire to enjoy being a “married” couple. When, in reality, all they wanted was the tax advantages. Anyone who believed anything else was stupid.


22 posted on 03/03/2009 8:49:34 AM PST by CitizenM ("An excuse is worse than an lie, because an excuse is a lie hidden." Pope John Paul, II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

I don’t care if you live on Mars. Romney has always been a good friend and supporter of the ‘gay community’. Ask MassResistance how they feel about the Mittster.


23 posted on 03/03/2009 8:50:29 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
Yep! We'll end up with a federal judicial fiat ordering all 50 states to sanction same-sex “marriage”, to provide these couples with full benefits, etc. The federal Justice Department will then assume control of state marriage laws and policies to insure “non-discrimination.”

The libertarians will pat themselves on the back and say that's better than adding a federal marriage amendment to the Constitution defining marriage as between a man and a woman, as it always has been. That amendment would have violated “states’ rights”.

24 posted on 03/03/2009 8:53:48 AM PST by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Too bad! You are only married in your mind. You are a single woman living with a partner also a single women. I am sick about children living with you. The solution is easy MARRY A MAN.


25 posted on 03/03/2009 9:02:34 AM PST by Pilated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

> Romney has always been a good friend and supporter of
> the ‘gay community’

Gee that must be why the ‘gay community’ worked so hard for Romney’s opposition.
:/


26 posted on 03/03/2009 9:13:24 AM PST by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: puroresu
If your guess happens and they do legalize Fag marriage in all 50 states by Federal Fiat along withe a few other socialist moves, the only way out would be for Civil War II, which I am completely torn whether or nor it could ever happen.
27 posted on 03/03/2009 9:43:39 AM PST by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson