Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Designated High-Speed Rail Corridors Description
federal government ^ | 02/23/09 | US Dept of Transportation

Posted on 03/02/2009 6:58:51 AM PST by TornadoAlley3

Designated High-Speed Rail Corridors Map

As of January 2002, the FRA has designated ten high-speed corridors under section 1010 of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Act of 1991 (ISTEA) and Section 1103(c) of the Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21). Designation allows a corridor to receive specially targeted funding for highway-rail grade crossing safety improvements, and recognizes the corridor as a potential center of HSR activity. These designated corridors are shown on the map at the beginning of this document and are listed below, generally from Southwest to Northeast.

DESIGNATED HIGH-SPEED RAIL CORRIDORS:

California Corridor

Pacific Northwest Corridor

South Central Corridor

Gulf Coast Corridor

Chicago Hub Network

Florida Corridor

Southeast Corridor

Keystone Corridor

Empire Corridor

Northern New England Corridor

NOT A "DESIGNATED HIGH-SPEED RAIL CORRIDOR":

Northeast Corridor (Please Note : The Northeast Corridor main line is not a "designated high-speed rail corridor" for purposes of 23 U.S.C. Section 104(d)(2) ("Railway-highway crossing hazard elimination in high-speed rail corridors") nor for programs that depend upon that Section, such as the high-speed rail corridor development program in Section 501(d) of Public Law 110-432, the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (49 U.S.C. 26106).)

Passenger Rail / High-Speed Ground Transportation / High-Speed Rail

Last Updated: Feb. 23, 2009


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bhodot; corriders; federalgovt; rail; railroad; usdot

1 posted on 03/02/2009 6:58:51 AM PST by TornadoAlley3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2009/02/louisiana_to_seek_new_orleansb.html

NO can get their evacuees out faster. I do not know enough about this, is it cost effective, why not private sector doing it?

2 posted on 03/02/2009 7:01:14 AM PST by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

http://www.courierpostonline.com/article/20090227/NEWS01/902270380/1006

Obama backs high speed rail

3 posted on 03/02/2009 7:10:34 AM PST by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Oh fantastico. We can get more mexicans from San Antonio to Tulsa! Critically important!

4 posted on 03/02/2009 7:13:49 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

I’m all for smaller government, but if congress and this admin are going to push ahead with massive stimulus packages I’d rather it be spent on things like this than paying people to not work.


5 posted on 03/02/2009 7:18:51 AM PST by posterchild (Endowed by my Creator with certain inalienable rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Interesting that they don’t have the DFW, San Antonio, Houston triangle as has been proposed before. Airline lobbying?


6 posted on 03/02/2009 7:38:33 AM PST by Squidpup ("Fight the Good Fight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson