Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why did Nadya Suleman (Octomom) Nix Free 24-hour Child Care?
LA Times ^ | 2/1/09 | Elizabeth Snead

Posted on 03/02/2009 4:22:06 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: mefistofelerevised

21 posted on 03/02/2009 5:35:45 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

She had better make her deals right now. The do or die date is coming quickly. Eventually the hospital will release the children and she won’t have much time to lead an entourage around LA.


22 posted on 03/02/2009 5:38:38 AM PST by pennyfarmer (Shiite Muslim named Bob.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

Do the Angels do it for money by getting their own contracts?


23 posted on 03/02/2009 5:40:51 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

Actually, this may have been a rare rational decision by the amazingly irrational Nadya Suleman. From what I’ve read, Angels in Waiting didn’t actually have the money to do this for more than a very short time, and was planning to “rely on donations”. In other words, it’s a self-promoting fund-raising organization.

Angels is Waiting was purportedly founded to encourage nurses (mainly NICU nurses) to take in premature babies as foster children and bill Medi-Cal professional rates for their care. On the surface, an activity with a charitable purpose, but one has to wonder why it’s now promoting itself via the Suleman case. And do NICU nurses in California really need an organization to tell them that they can bill the taxpayers for taking NICU babies into foster care? And was billing the taxpayers the only real plan for for making good on this “offer” to provide care for the Suleman children?

The fact that Gloria Allred is now blabbering that she “filed a request for an investigation with Los Angeles County Child and Family Services into how Suleman will care for her children” is just further evidence of the organization’s self-promoting aims. The hospital already has a social worker on the case and the whole world knows about this woman’s situation. LA County CFS hardly needs Gloria Allred to alert them to the fact that this woman doesn’t have a viable plan for taking care of her 14 children. And for some bizarre reason, Angels in Waiting had put a deadline on accepting its offer — a normal strategy for a fast-talking salesman, but unfathomable for an organization supposedly dedicated to helping provide nursing care for premature infants.


24 posted on 03/02/2009 5:41:56 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pennyfarmer

Octotots Offered Free Clothing for a Year!

http://extratv.warnerbros.com/2009/03/octotots_offered_free_clothes.php


25 posted on 03/02/2009 5:43:51 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

Did you see the press conference? the woman lawyer Albread? Aldread? was sitting next to the charity spokeswoman.

I think it is a publicity stunt all the way around.

The octomom may be scum, but I can’t see giving up control of my kids to some left wing charity associated with that lawyer.


26 posted on 03/02/2009 5:43:56 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

They bill Medi-Cal, at least that’s been their scheme so far. The deal is that nurses take NICU babies home on a foster care basis, and then bill professional rates to the state for caring for them at home, instead of caring for them in a hospital. I’m sure this is often good for the babies, but it’s not exactly my idea of a “charity”.


27 posted on 03/02/2009 5:45:51 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

28 posted on 03/02/2009 5:49:25 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa; GovernmentShrinker; longtermmemmory

“The non-profit (Angels in Waiting) told Suleman that they couldn’t agree to working in stride with a camera crew because of the risk it posed to the babies’ health and their ability to do their work.”
***********************************

http://laist.com/2009/02/28/if_you_cant_get_me_my_14_kids_on_tv.php


29 posted on 03/02/2009 5:50:08 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

Allred is all about government is the solution.

I wonder which one gives the mother more control.

governemnt intervention or a tv show which gives parental contol in the face of government?


30 posted on 03/02/2009 5:51:58 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

thanks for the info, I figured if alred was involved there is a scam in there somewhere.


31 posted on 03/02/2009 5:56:06 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta
lawyer Gloria Allred said she filed a request for an investigation with Los Angeles County Child and Family Services into how Suleman will care for her children.

Scary on so many levels.

How do we protect children without having the state and lawyers crawling all over?

And if I remember the name right, wherever Allred goes, a TV camera or five is not far behind.

32 posted on 03/02/2009 6:03:34 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Scarpetta

STRETCH MARKS ALERT! SAGGY T*TS ALERT!


33 posted on 03/02/2009 6:04:38 AM PST by Doc Savage ("Are you saying Jesus can't hit a curve ball? - Harris to Cerrano - Major League)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

Allard probably wanted the cash from a “reality show.”


34 posted on 03/02/2009 6:05:47 AM PST by mefistofelerevised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg
Shysters rarely get involved without seeing a personal benefit of some sort and I strongly suspect she is no exception. I’m betting for her, this is all about the cameras, the babies are an opportunity to get her face on Fox and cnn and nothing else.

True, but both the state and many 'non-profits' are actually pursuing FUNDING under the guise of helping the children.

Don't get me wrong, there are many worthy organizations out there, but the ones run by liberals, politicians and involving lawyers/judges always seem to have a big payoff for someone, somewhere!

35 posted on 03/02/2009 6:09:34 AM PST by MamaTexan (It's time to STAND UP, America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan
...the ones run by liberals, politicians and involving lawyers/judges always seem to have a big payoff for someone, somewhere!

Agreed.
36 posted on 03/02/2009 7:30:48 AM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Warning: Sarcasm/humor is always engaged. Failure to recognize this may lead to misunderstandings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson