Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SumProVita; misterrob
All, the original story is at http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009/03/cantor-rejects.html

SumProVita wrote:
My guess is that this is a communication snafu. I doubt he truly understands what Rush ACTUALLY said with regard to this.
Then he should have answered something like, "I haven't heard all of Rush Limbaugh's comments yesterday."

misterrob wrote:
Cantor has to stand for election and as such cannot be advocating failure. Limbaugh gets to sit on the sidelines and say whatever he wants (as he should).

Is it that hard for people to recognize the distinction?

You have a valid point.

But the question was a trap.

And instead of making his way around the trap, Mr. Cantor chose to jump right into the trap.

The best answer would have been something like, "I want the American people to succeed. And I want us to get back no track with real economic growth and real opportunities. But we Republicans have serious differences with the President on policy issues, and where we disagree, I intend to communicate our alternative, our message of hope and change based on our stronger principles and beliefs."

69 posted on 03/01/2009 11:52:08 AM PST by cc2k (When less than half the voters pay taxes, it's called "taxation without representation.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: cc2k

Yes, you are correct. Hindsight is always 20/20 and human beings are not perfect.


111 posted on 03/01/2009 12:11:42 PM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson