[whattajoke]

I suppose the inability to see the ramifications and conflicts engendered by two mutually opposing belief systems would be a problem.

Millions disagree. Including me. Since when is science a "belief system?" Is physics a "belief system?" Astronomy? Chemistry? When you go to your doctor, do you accept the science he uses to treat you or do you A) thank him for his "belief system" or B) avoid the doctor at all costs because you'll just pray that broken leg away?

[shibumi]

"Millions disagree. Including me. Since when is science a "belief system?" Is physics a "belief system?" Astronomy? Chemistry? When you go to your doctor, do you accept the science he uses to treat you or do you A) thank him for his "belief system" or B) avoid the doctor at all costs because you'll just pray that broken leg away?"

Thanks for making my point.

Darwinian Evolutionary "Theory" is not science. It is a belief system searching (vainly) for scientific validation, which is yet to be forthcoming.