Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limbaugh lights up CPAC (also received CPAC’s “Defender of the Constitution Award")
The Hill ^ | 2/28/09 | Molly K. Hooper

Posted on 03/01/2009 8:25:35 AM PST by NormsRevenge

Conservative radio star Rush Limbaugh lit a flame under thousands of conservatives Saturday night in an address at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C.

In an hour and fifteen minute speech, which came before he received CPAC’s “Defender of the Constitution Award,” Limbaugh called on Republicans not to stray from their core principles and explained why it's fine to attack President Obama. He also took a number of shots at Democrats, who he portrayed as the party of big government.

“(Republicans) want the country to succeed and for the country to succeed its people, its individuals must succeed," Limbaugh said to an adoring crowd that gave him about 18 standing ovations. Some conference attendees stood in line for up to four hours to get a seat in the ballroom where Limbaugh spoke. Limbaugh said the country will succeed if individuals pursue their excellence, and he criticized Democrats for puttting forth a message that people they can only succeed with a hand from the government.

"Everyone among us must be pursuing his ambition or her desire, whatever, with excellence. Trying to be the best they can be," he said. "Not told, as they are told by the Democrat Party: You really can't do that, you don't have what it takes, besides you're a minority or you're a woman and there are too many people that want to discriminate against you. You can't get anywhere. You need to depend on us.”

Limbaugh said there was more racism displayed in the Democratic party in the last election cycle than in the GOP. “You know what the cliche is, a conservative: racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe. If you were paying attention, I know you were, the racism in our culture was exclusively and full on display in the Democrat[ic] primary last year,” Limbaugh said.

The conservative talk show host was criticized in some quarters for playing a song entitled "Barack the Magic Negro" that parodied a newspaper column written by a liberal writer. He has also been criticized for stating that he hoped Obama's presidency would fail because of Obama's push for bigger government.

Limbaugh also criticized his own party, including 2008 GOP presidential contender Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), for compromising conservative principles for the sake of winning an election. If conservatives want to succeed there is no room for compromise or bipartisanship, he said.

“Everybody seems to go orgasmic over the concept of bipartisanship,” Limbaugh said. “Bipartisanship occurs only after one other result, and that is victory."

He also said he does not see Obama and Democrats compromising.

"Somebody tell me where is the compromise on all of this spending? Where is the compromise on all this punishment of the achievers," he said.

Limbaugh defended his comments about hoping Obama fails. "That's nothing more than common sense and to not be able to say it, why in the world do I want what we just described; rampant government, growth indebtedness, wealth that's not even being created yet that is being spent, what is in this," he said. " What possibly is in this that anybody of us want to succeed?"

Limbaugh asked if Democrats wanted the war on Iraq to fail. The crowd answered, "Yes."

In a straw poll conducted over the course of CPAC’s three-day conference, Limbaugh came in first as the “King of Conservative Media.” Fox News hosts Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity came in second and third, respectively.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cpac; lightsup; limbaugh; rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: jla
BTTT

21 posted on 03/01/2009 8:56:06 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
Do you think the Limbaugh used...apologizing because it is a long.

The Dragon has a few quirks that need to be worked out. LOL (Only kidding)

22 posted on 03/01/2009 8:56:23 AM PST by jla (Sarah! sarahpac.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Peter W. Kessler

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2196657/posts


23 posted on 03/01/2009 9:02:16 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; Miss Didi; LottieDah; firebrand; Arizona Carolyn; Liz; Alamo-Girl; potlatch; ...
Saw it on TV and agree with just about everything Rush had to say, but it was pretty much nothing new for regular radio show listeners. Even the anecdotes were from recent radio shows, it seemed.

But he humorously kept referring to it as "my first speech on national television," so I suppose that there were many watching who were hearing the material for the first time.

FYI, it was surprisingly on CNN as well as Fox News. CNN even gave it some typical leftist MSM post-event commentary from four different talking heads, the kind of treatment you might expect them to give a (Republican) presidential address.

24 posted on 03/01/2009 9:04:37 AM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

What, in particular, did he think was over the top?


25 posted on 03/01/2009 9:09:18 AM PST by murron (Proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Thanks for the ping!


26 posted on 03/01/2009 9:10:49 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nmh
The new RNC handler, Steele, thought Limbaugh was “over the top” in a NEGATIVE way

Are you serious? If anything, Rush was incredibly positive! At least towards conservative values. He was negative towards leftist values. That's sort of like if a doctor were to say that saving lives is good, and murder is bad, that Steele would say that the doctor was being "negative."

Mark

27 posted on 03/01/2009 9:11:13 AM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
Was Al Gore's travesty of a movie, An Undeniable Truth good because it was short?

I think that it was a better movie than it would have been, had it been longer. In fact, the only way to improve it would be to cut it even shorter. I think for it to be the best movie it could have been, it should have been cut to about 11 seconds. That would be enough for the title shot and "The End?", like any bad horror (or in this case, "whore") movie.

Mark

28 posted on 03/01/2009 9:15:26 AM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93; SouthTexas; Piquaboy; Arrowhead1952; SkyPilot; freekitty

IMO, the MSM won’t be able to continually hide the foul smell that is increasing each day with the Left’s Socialist agenda. Reality will overcome the propaganda. I, for one, pray that it won’t come too late to save our country and our freedom. The MSM would make Joseph Goebbel’s proud.


29 posted on 03/01/2009 9:16:06 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Thanks

I cannot post here what I’m thinking. The moderator would remove it, and me, instantly.

Suffice it to say I am angry.


30 posted on 03/01/2009 9:19:27 AM PST by Peter W. Kessler (Dirt is for racing... asphalt is for getting there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
Like mass approaching the speed of light, Al Gore's movie would approach absolute perfection as it was cut to zero.


31 posted on 03/01/2009 9:23:21 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

Appropriate, since he’s been frank.


32 posted on 03/01/2009 9:24:29 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
MEMORABLE "President Obama is so busy trying to foment and create anger in a created atmosphere of crisis, he is so busy fueling the emotions of class envy that he's forgotten it's not his money that he's spending.

[Applause]

In fact, the money he's spending is not ours. He's spending wealth that has yet to be created. And that is not sustainable. It will not work. This has been tried around the world. And every time it's been tried, it's a failed disaster."

33 posted on 03/01/2009 9:42:18 AM PST by Liz (Problem with socialism is you eventually run out of other people*s money. M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

The new RNC handler, Steele, thought Limbaugh was “over the top” in a NEGATIVE way
Are you serious? If anything, Rush was incredibly positive! At least towards conservative values. He was negative towards leftist values. That’s sort of like if a doctor were to say that saving lives is good, and murder is bad, that Steele would say that the doctor was being “negative.”

Mark

You misunderstood me.

BLACK RHINO, Steels thought Rush was “over the top” in a negative way.

I’m fine with Rush.

What we need is a human being with some balls.

Who tells it like it is.

Do you want SOCIALISM or CAPITALISM?

Do you want INFACTICIDE to be LEGAL?

Show a picture of a BLACK BABY, a WHITE BABY, a HISPANICE BABY - your choice and SHOW what INFANTICIDE IS.

SHOW the baby without arms and legs.

SHOW the baby without a head.

SHOW the GORE or what people want as a “right”.

It’s time to stop playing footsie.

We’re past that. It’s a war as far as I’m concerned.

BLACK RHINO, Steele doesn’t have that in him.

Steele still wants to poohoo the REALITY of where we really are. He wants to believe that a SOFT, GENTLE message will wake people up. It hasn’t and wont’. It’s more of the same FAILED APPROACH that lead the GOP to where it is now - the voiceless minority.


34 posted on 03/01/2009 9:45:14 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: All

RNC chair, Steele dissed Limbaugh. Has the GOP not learned anything from defeat?

EMAIL chairman@gop.com

MESSAGE: NO money until conservatibe Republican principles take priority. We tried it RINO Rudy, McC and the punk neoconservatives’ way........... and we LOST bigtime.


35 posted on 03/01/2009 9:47:53 AM PST by Liz (Problem with socialism is you eventually run out of other people*s money. M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Peter W. Kessler

Where is Steele quoted as saying this?

I absolutely believe he said such a thing, but I want to see / hear the words.

I am P.O.’d.

Right here:

http://www.freedomslighthouse.com/2009/03/gop-chairman-michael-steele-calls.html

GOP Chairman Michael Steele Calls Limbaugh Comments “Incendiary and Ugly” - Video 2/28/09

Here is video of Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele talking with CNN’s D.L. Hughley last night, and calling comments made by Rush Limbaugh during his speech to CPAC “incendiary and ugly.” Steele said Limbaugh is not the de facto leader of the Republican Party, and that he is an “entertainter.”

This is exactly the point Rush Limbaugh was trying to make in his speech. Republicans need to stop worrying about what the D.L. Hughley’s think! They will never like conservatives or Republicans, because they are liberals! Steele should not have disavowed, in effect, what Rush said. He should have hammered home the core principles set forth by Limbaugh in his speech.

http://www.freedomslighthouse.com/2009/03/gop-chairman-michael-steele-calls.html

Get rid of Steele.

We don’t have time for this pussies.

I don’t care what skin color we put up as the RNC.
What I do know is BLACK, RHINO, Steele is taking is further in the WRONG direction. Enough is ENOUGH!


36 posted on 03/01/2009 9:48:17 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: murron

Nothing as far as I am concerned.

BLACK RHINO Steele sees it otherwise.

http://www.freedomslighthouse.com/2009/03/gop-chairman-michael-steele-calls.html

GOP Chairman Michael Steele Calls Limbaugh Comments “Incendiary and Ugly” - Video 2/28/09

Here is video of Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele talking with CNN’s D.L. Hughley last night, and calling comments made by Rush Limbaugh during his speech to CPAC “incendiary and ugly.” Steele said Limbaugh is not the de facto leader of the Republican Party, and that he is an “entertainter.”

This is exactly the point Rush Limbaugh was trying to make in his speech. Republicans need to stop worrying about what the D.L. Hughley’s think! They will never like conservatives or Republicans, because they are liberals! Steele should not have disavowed, in effect, what Rush said. He should have hammered home the core principles set forth by Limbaugh in his speech.

http://www.freedomslighthouse.com/2009/03/gop-chairman-michael-steele-calls.html

Get rid of Steele.

We don’t have time for this pussies.


37 posted on 03/01/2009 9:49:33 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Steele said Limbaugh is not the de facto leader of the Republican Party, and that he is an “entertainer.”

Damn straight! Rush is the leader of the conservative movement!

The Republican Party is nothing more than Dem-Lite!

I didn't leave the Republican Party! It left me, and it joined the Democrat Party!!

38 posted on 03/01/2009 9:52:53 AM PST by airborne (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness! Enjoy it while you can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

They chose Steele simply because he is BLACK and a RHINO to sway other RHINOS. His choice was not based on CONSERVATIVE VALUES or PRINCIPLES. He was chosen soley on SKIN COLOR. He is another J.C. Watts. He is another Colin Powell. He is another LOSER.


39 posted on 03/01/2009 9:54:07 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

Try this website:

http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/mdmanual/08conoff/html/msa13921.html

Check out this one too:

http://www.rnc.org/

Give Steele a piece of your mind.

I haven’t joined the RNC because they do NOT represent conservatives.


40 posted on 03/01/2009 9:57:24 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson