Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom

*FWIW.... where did you get the idea that it’s bad form to respond to a 3 year old post? Where’s that in the posting guidelines?*

It is generally accepted as bad behavior to do such a thing - been that way since the early days of usenet.


94 posted on 03/01/2009 10:55:48 AM PST by DevNet (What's past is prologue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: DevNet

So if I just now happen to find something that I’m interested in and want to comment on, it’s bad form to reply to it even though I never knew of its existence before?

Right.....

That excuse won’t wash. You’ll have to find a better one for why the evos never responded much to it. It was certainly posted at a time of active crevo debates and enough of them saw it who did post an odd comment or two. If one sees it, they all see it.

I stand by the comment; it was virtually ignored by FR evos because it didn’t provide adequate material to mock and ridicule creationists, even though a couple gave it the old college try. Threads that don’t allow for one-size-fits-all creationist stereotyping never get much evo participation.


108 posted on 03/01/2009 3:02:58 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson