*FWIW.... where did you get the idea that its bad form to respond to a 3 year old post? Wheres that in the posting guidelines?*
It is generally accepted as bad behavior to do such a thing - been that way since the early days of usenet.
So if I just now happen to find something that I’m interested in and want to comment on, it’s bad form to reply to it even though I never knew of its existence before?
Right.....
That excuse won’t wash. You’ll have to find a better one for why the evos never responded much to it. It was certainly posted at a time of active crevo debates and enough of them saw it who did post an odd comment or two. If one sees it, they all see it.
I stand by the comment; it was virtually ignored by FR evos because it didn’t provide adequate material to mock and ridicule creationists, even though a couple gave it the old college try. Threads that don’t allow for one-size-fits-all creationist stereotyping never get much evo participation.