if Tiktaalik has a ‘finger bone’ that even remotely resembles a land dweller- then by golly they are a transition dontachaknow? Homological similarities are proof positive that we’re all descended from molecules- and that is that- after all,
There are species of spiders that ‘live’ underwater and ‘breath’ underwater- of course they only briefly make forrays into the water, and can only breath by tapping into trapped underwater airbubbles, but by golly, since they are ‘aqautic spiders’ I must hterefore assume they are descended from Brown Trout, which as we all know, have been known to briefly ‘breathe’ out of water, and since they can leap great distances in the air this would of course indicate that htese brown trout are descended from air breathing ‘flying Squirrels’, who as you know, simply could not make a go of it on the ground, and feared becomming extinct, so, while some million or so other ground dwellers did just fine on the ground, these critters took to the trees (Which apparently had no predators), and since these ‘flying’ squirrels are able to glide from tree to tree- gliding right over hte heads of all the other poor saps on the ground who were surviving just fine, and since flying squirrels like to drink water, then this must hterefore mean that ‘flying squirrels’ are henceforth descended from ‘flying fish’.
Evidence? How dare you request any evidence?!!! Skin flaps under squirrels armpits evolved into fully functional wing structures, and squirrels evolved avian lungs and muscle structures all in anticipation of one day soaring high in the sky dag nabbit! And that is that! Just look around you at al lthe hological ‘similarities’- that should be proof enough that everythign descended from pond scum right there! How dare you quesiton Sir god Darwin?!!!
Lobe-finned fish are a LONG LONG way off from being any sort of ‘transitional’ species as their ‘digits’ and ‘ankle and wrist’ bones were NOT capable of bearign hteir wieght on land
IF Tiktaalik and other lobe finned fish are the best ‘examples of Macroevolution’ that Nat Geo or any scientist can put forth as their ‘best’ examples of transtions- then by golly their hypothesis of macroevolution is in serious serious trouble. Take a close look at their ‘best example’ of water-to-land ‘transitional charts’ and you will note some glaring and blatant gaps with NO intermediary evidences to back up their claims. The gaps are HUGE- they are NOT nearly as insignificant as thecharts intentionally mislead people to think they are!
==IF Tiktaalik and other lobe finned fish are the best ‘examples of Macroevolution’ that Nat Geo or any scientist can put forth as their ‘best’ examples of transtions- then by golly their hypothesis of macroevolution is in serious serious trouble.
They know this. That is why they can no longer simply ignore Creation and ID scientists. That’s why they are lashing out and attacking us, because we are making them look like complete idiots. They can’t attack the message because they have no answer. So they are forced to attack the messenger. To my mind, it just shows how desperate they are. Indeed, it has gotten so bad that the Darwiniacs are beginning to throw Darwood overboard with articles with such titles as “What Darwin Didn’t Know,” and “Darwin Must Die, So that Evolution Can Live.” I have been predicting this day for the last several years, as the desperation in the Darwin Party had become palpable. Don’t they realize that when they casually throw these so-called “missing links” out there, they are setting themselves up for future embarrassment? Don’t they realize that the Creation and ID scientists will be there to rub in their faces for decades to come? Talk about myopia!