Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dware

>> And I see that it is the same “resistance” that have had their butts handed to them for the better part of the last two or three decades.

Three decades? Since 1979, we’ve won 5 of 8 Presidential elections, and we controlled Congress from 1994-2006. And, as Democrats go, Bill Clinton was on the conservative side (he was comparable ideologically to Nixon — particularly after we took Congress). Barack Obama is the first truly liberal President we’ve had since 1980 (with the possible exception of Clinton’s first two years).

We had the most conservative President in 50 years (Reagan), and no true conservative has lost a Presidential election since 1979. We’ve seen the media monopoly crumble with the emergence of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, conservative talk radio, and the Fox News Channel. We’ve seen the nomination and confirmation of Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia, John Roberts and Samuel Alito, to create what will likely be (with Kennedy) a longstanding conservative majority on the Court.

With regards to policy — we’ve seen several substantial tax cuts in that time, welfare reform, Court recognition of the 2nd Amendment, and until recently, the economy has thrived. We crushed Soviet Communism, saved Kuwait, liberated Iraq, and are making headway in Afghanistan. We’ve got Al Quiada on the run and haven’t seen any domestic terrorism in 8 years.

There may have been some failures over the last 30 years ... but there has also been a LOT of success for the Republican/conservative resistance over that time.

>> The same “resistance” that is treated like the red-headed step child by their own “leaders” in Washington.

We’ve never been a top-down movement. This resistance starts from the bottom-up.

Right now, our current “leaders” are less important than discovering our future leaders. Bobby Jindal, Sarah Palin, Eric Cantor, Mark Samford, etc. will be those leaders — until then, Rush is king. In addition, with the exception of several worthless Senators, I was very impressed with Republicans in Congress and the Senate for standing up to the “stimulus”.

>> It’s time for the “resistance” to grow some balls and make something of themselves.

We got lazy in our success since 1980, and we stopped fighting the ground war — we stopped selling conservatism. But, we’ve started up again. The Republican resistance, however futile, to the stimulus was the first step. We have overcome these odds before. We will again.

>> Only then will we represent a REAL resistance.

We have, since William F. Buckley’s National Review started in the 50’s, always represented a real resistance. Don’t believe me? Ask Jimmy Carter, Walter Mondale, Michael Dukakis, Al Gore, and John Kerry. Ask Bill Clinton, whose agenda was stifled by Newt Gingrich and the “Contract w/ America”, and who was impeached because of our resistance. Ask the “moveon” goofballs that fly into a tizzy everytime Rush Limbaugh opens his mouth.

This isn’t a bright time for conservatives, I am fully aware. But, this isn’t much different than it was in 1976 when Carter was elected, or in the first two years of the Clinton Administration. Democrats controlled all. But, in 1980, we had Morning in America ... and in 1994, we seized agenda control back from Bill.

Morning in America will come again.

SnakeDoc


190 posted on 03/01/2009 8:56:52 PM PST by SnakeDoctor (Proud Charter Member of the Republican Resistance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]


To: SnakeDoctor
The only successes we have truly had were Reagan & no terrorist attacks since 9/11. As for Republican control from 2000 - 2006? Who cares? We allowed W. and the Pubbies to piss it away, all in the name of "bipartisanship". Make no mistake about it - the only reason to reach across the aisle is to CRUSH the socialist ideology of the leftist extremists.

And '12? I don't see much hope considering the current makeup of the potential "leaders". Palin would be my choice, but she was smeared too much by the "LEADERSHIP" OF HER OWN PARTY! Jindal is a decent enough man, but he better work on his charisma if he wants to beat out O.

192 posted on 03/02/2009 4:07:05 AM PST by dware (3 prohibited topics in mixed company: politics, religion and operating systems...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson