Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Obama Didn't Say in His 18-Month Iraq Withdrawal Timetable
AINA (Assyrian International News Agency) ^ | February 27, 2009 | Anna Mulrine

Posted on 02/28/2009 9:14:44 AM PST by Ravnagora

President Obama's announcement of an 18-month timeline today for withdrawing U.S. combat forces from Iraq included a notable nod to his U.S. military commanders. "Let there be no doubt," he acknowledged during a visit to Camp Lejeune, N.C. "Iraq is not yet secure." He added that "too many fundamental questions remain unresolved."

No one is more aware of this point than the U.S. military. President Obama's plan to bring U.S. troops home ultimately represents a compromise between top U.S. military commanders on the ground in Iraq--who pushed for a slower-than-16-month timeline while warning the president and his advisers that Iraq could still backslide into violence--and those within the administration and on Capitol Hill who were backing a speedier withdrawal.

The military's biggest cause for concern was left unmentioned during Obama's speech. Within the halls of the Pentagon, the talk these days often turns to the worrisome tensions between Kurds and Arabs in Iraq. Both groups continue to vie for power, particularly in the still-volatile northern regions of Kirkuk and Mosul.

Indeed, a number of senior military commanders cite the potential for Arab-Kurdish violence as the greatest challenge that Iraq now faces. There are also considerable worries that the Iraqi Ministry of Defense is continuing to drag its feet on the matter of integrating Kurdish forces into Iraq's national army.

Military analysts are emphasizing one element of Obama's plan that they hope will buy U.S. forces more time to help resolve these concerns. By August 2010, the U.S. combat mission in Iraq will end. But "combat" mission is the key.

The Status of Forces Agreement signed late last year already stipulates that U.S. combat forces have to be out of all Iraqi cities by June of this year. In response, Gen. Raymond Odierno, the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, last year said that U.S. troops would continue their work as "trainers" at the joint security stations that they share with Iraqi counterparts in cities throughout the country. Though they are combat troops in many regards, calling these U.S. forces "trainers" allows them to stay in the cities and continue to work with Iraqi security forces.

These security stations were a vital element of the surge strategy, and they are widely credited with helping to control violence in the cities. While U.S. combat troops must be out by mid-2010, up to 50,000 U.S. troops are expected to stay in a training capacity until December 2011.

With Obama's announcement today, however, U.S. military commanders note that the clock has begun ticking. Now, they add, the hard work of implementing the withdrawal plan begins.

By Anna Mulrine www.usnews.com

______________


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhodod; iraq; obama; timetable; troopwithdrawal

1 posted on 02/28/2009 9:14:45 AM PST by Ravnagora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ravnagora

2 posted on 02/28/2009 9:19:15 AM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravnagora
Didn't eh UN , US and Iraq already last year sign an agreement ending our commitment in Iraq next year? Isn't this much to do about something Bush already committed to?
3 posted on 02/28/2009 9:21:41 AM PST by edcoil (Slave owners could justify themselves too. Think about it Arnold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravnagora

I turned the TV on for just a second yesterday.

I was surprised at all the loud clapping he was getting. I turned the TV off right away. I was sickened by all that positive response.

Oh well. I’m glad I live in Panama.


4 posted on 02/28/2009 9:26:42 AM PST by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
I was surprised at all the loud clapping he was getting. I turned the TV off right away. I was sickened by all that positive response.

Well, he is the CinC (like it or not). I saw the speech and noticed the servicemen and women in the audince and behind the President on the podium had very businesslike expressions on their faces. I am not sure the response was so much positive as polite.

5 posted on 02/28/2009 9:35:31 AM PST by AzSteven ("War is less costly than servitude, the choice is always between Verdun and Dachau." Jean Dutourd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ravnagora
"While U.S. combat troops must be out by mid-2010, up to 50,000 U.S. troops are expected to stay in a training capacity until December 2011."

That is Bush's plan as specified in the security agreements and Obama is a weasel for stealing Bush's hard work.

6 posted on 02/28/2009 9:36:39 AM PST by avacado (Bipartisanship is when Democrats and Republicans get together to rob the American people blind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ravnagora
The LVRJ this morning above the fold.

"OBAMA outlines timetable for exit." [from Iraq]

Two statements from with pics quoted from citizens.

"Im Glad. All that money wasted...."

"I had a son in IRAQ and I am just glad they are coming home and don't have to go back."

There were two other statements but the POINT is that NOW, after OBAMA, they are coming home and never going back.

The IGNORANT MASSES and the LEFT WING LVRJ working to keep them that way!!

7 posted on 02/28/2009 9:42:58 AM PST by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

A status of forces agreement is only between the US and Iraq. The UN is not involved and no other country can be named. Nobody wants the UN involved.


8 posted on 02/28/2009 9:50:48 AM PST by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ravnagora

0bama:
“all troops will leave Iraq”
“50,000 troops will remain”
Another broken promise
0bama refuses to make a clear in/out decision, and instead “votes present”


9 posted on 02/28/2009 2:16:07 PM PST by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobS

Thanks. But didn’t we already agree to leave next year anyway?


10 posted on 03/01/2009 9:05:26 AM PST by edcoil (Slave owners could justify themselves too. Think about it Arnold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson