[Dog Gone]

Intelligent Design does have a religious bias, which should be freely admitted. It’s patently absurd, or outright disingenous, to deny it.

But an attack on evolution, based on the assertion that Darwin was a racist, is about as stupid of an attack on science as it could get.

If you want to attack science, do it. Attacking the scientist is not attacking science. It’s something else entirely.

[Jaime2099]

Intelligent Design does have a religious bias, which should be freely admitted. It’s patently absurd, or outright disingenous, to deny it.

If you believe in Human Evolution, then why do you deny your own religious bias. Human Evolution is the teaching and writings of a man who has followers (believers); it's simply a (silly) religion. It is in no way of any kind of sound science. You have faith in Human Evolution, Creationists faith in Creation is far great than your faith in Human Evolution because yours is a faith without a god (pointless).