Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Natural Law
The "evidence" you cite as exculpatory is still only an allegation.

Ah no. actually it's a part of the permanent evidentiary record of the criminal trial and can be used in any civil actions as well.

During that criminal trial, evidence was produced that at the time of her arrest Steffey was under the influence of alcohol and medication and was not the victim of an assault.

Evidence showed that on that day, Steffey had assaulted her niece, who was six months pregnant, and that she had also attacked and choked her teenage nephew.

171 posted on 02/28/2009 3:35:07 PM PST by Valpal1 (Always be prepared to make that difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]


To: Valpal1
" it's a part of the permanent evidentiary "

All that means is that it is cited as having been introduced as evidence. It doesn't render it as fact, that is for any subsequent jury to decide for. There is probably conflicting evidence submitted by the defense. Bottom line is that none of that excuses or dismisses the criminal behavior of the sheriffs deputies involved. She doesn't have to be a saint for them to be sinners.

173 posted on 02/28/2009 3:46:02 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson