[Krankor]

Where is there a requirement for any news organization to be required to present both sides of an argument? As long as the film was unedited the viewer can decide what other information might be warranted.

Well, we're not talking arguments here. We're not talking about editorializing. We're talking about reporting the news. According to you reasoning, as long as a TV station airs a video of, say, Barack Obamaa arguing his views on the stimulus, there's no need for that same station to air any opposing views. The viewers can simply look at the Obama video and decide for themselves. Huh? Double huh?

[Natural Law]

"According to you reasoning, as long as a TV station airs a video of, say, Barack Obamaa arguing his views on the stimulus, there's no need for that same station to air any opposing views."

Those entrusted with the powers and responsibilities of law enforcement officers must live and act as though they are in a fish bowl of scrutiny. I don't care how you try to spin this the video speaks for itself and I can't fathom there being any statements, film evidence or excuses these criminals with badges could put forth to mitigate their behavior.