"Then, we agree. The fix is in. None of us were at this ex parte meeting."
Posted on 02/28/2009 5:18:23 AM PST by SvenMagnussen
"Then, we agree. The fix is in. None of us were at this ex parte meeting."
if they get the records it’s going to be another geraldo/al capone moment. I suspect the evidence they seek was destroyed 2+ years ago
Keep the heat on this issue. The truth would be so simple to produce. Why is 0bama holding it up? I smell a rat...a DhimmiRat.
I think if he was such a hot shot barrister, He’d have changed his name before he got so high profile ... Gary KREEP ?
Kreep is evidently a “part-time” attorney and full time Republican activist...which goes a long way in explaining the posted pleading.
Gary Kreep. Unfortunate name.
if read aloud it’s music to the ear :)
yeah, & i’ve heard of Dr. Butts ,Proctologist-no kidding
If the subpoena was served in a manner that violated California law then why should Obama be obliged to respond to it?
I don’t think it went back that far. The fact he pretended to go to Hawaii to take care of his grandmother says he was there covering things up.
Makes me ill that someone could use their ill grandmother in such a manner.
Also, he sent Rahm to Africa to cover more up.
“if they get the records it’s going to be another geraldo/al capone moment. I suspect the evidence they seek was destroyed 2+ years ago” - henry_reardon
It’s a Subpoena Duces Tecum. A person representing Occidental College will have to appear to present the records and answer questions under oath. If they lie, the college could suffer irreparable harm.
Kreep merely wants to set the record straight. Obama claims he wants a transparent Presidency, but works overtime to coverup, obstruct and hide factual data.
Kreep wrote, “15. That counsel for PETITIONERS attempted to “meet and confer” with Mr. Strumwasser, one of the attorneys for MR. OBAMA, concerning this motion to quash, and that he was told in a telephone conversation with Mr. Strumwasser that there would be no negotiations on the subject.”
“That counsel for PETITIONERS attempted to “meet and confer” with Mr. Strumwasser, one of the attorneys for MR. OBAMA, concerning this motion to quash, and that he was told in a telephone conversation with Mr. Strumwasser that there would be no negotiations on the subject.””
Sven, Strumwasser doesn’t take the “part-time” lawyer Kreep seriously. As a general proposition, “part-time” lawyers file pleading which look like they have been drafted by part-timers. As a further general rule, “full time” lawyers seldom give “part-time” lawyers, especially those with a particular, or peculiar, ideological agenda, the time of day. Strumwasser, and I suspect the court, will give Mr. Kreep exactly the attention he and his pleading deserve.
Mr. Kreep has been actively defending the rights of Californians for years. You do a grave disservice to all of us with your remarks, which have no substance.
I agree, I just think he’s had every trace “sanitized”.I think lessons were learned from attempts by previous people to hide things. he seems to have been well supported and rose so quickly that opposition wasn’t really aware of him.
Obama is fighting to keep his college transcripts and housing records from seeing the light of day because he has something to hide.
“You do a grave disservice to all of us with your remarks, which have no substance.”
Are my words that dangerous or are the positions advanced by Kreep that weak and foolish?
Better than if the K and the P had been reversed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.