[UCANSEE2]

But there are very likely to be challenges to the legitamacy of any legislation signed by a "president" who is later found to have been constitutionally ineligible at the time of the signing.

I understand that. But, when it's the same 'crew' with a different 'leader', why would they roll back any agenda?

Obama didn't write these bills, he just signed them.

[justiceseeker93]

But when it's the same 'crew' with a different leader, why would they roll back any agenda?

Obviously, we are talking about a hypothetical situation.

But it could be that by the time the legislation was nullified, either the "same crew" collectively saw the error of their ways, ot that a the "crew" (Congress) had changed dramatically with an intervening election and the newer Congress had different inclinations.

[justiceseeker93]

But when it's the same 'crew' with a different leader, why would they roll back any agenda?

Obviously, we are talking about a hypothetical situation.

But it could be that by the time the legislation was nullified, either the "same crew" collectively saw the error of their ways, or that a the "crew" (Congress) had changed dramatically with an intervening election and the newer Congress had different inclinations.