Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sevenbak

I don’t support Romney because he supported liberal policies in Massachusetts. This does not lend itself to Romney having principles. He changed his mind when he thought he might have a chance at the Republican nomination in 2008.
Again a glaring lack principles.


17 posted on 02/27/2009 3:33:32 PM PST by txnativegop (God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: txnativegop
Actually, he did remarkably well thwarting a 80 percent liberal legislature. He did have to compromise on a few things, but not many. It's the very way he governed such a lib state in such a conservative direction why he would be excellent turning around this liberal leaning country to conservative ideals.

He was received with a thunderous applause at CPAC today. There are many FReepers here who hate the guy, but they, and apparently you live in a neo conservative bubble. Good luck with that.

26 posted on 02/27/2009 3:40:20 PM PST by sevenbak (We wrestle against principalities, powers, rulers of darkness, wickedness in high places.- Eph. 6:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: txnativegop

Please tell me who you think DID NOT have, as you put, “A glaring lack of principle”?

BTW: my Wife and I voted for Mitt in the Texas primaries.

Not once did we have reservations about his principles or his religion. We saw him as the candidate who would of been excellent dealing with the economy.

PS, my tag line reflects our current opinion.


80 posted on 02/27/2009 4:31:51 PM PST by wolfcreek (There is no 2 party system only arrogant Pols and their handlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson