Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. to yield marijuana jurisdiction to states
SFGATE.COM ^

Posted on 02/27/2009 11:44:36 AM PST by MAD-AS-HELL

(02-26) 20:00 PST San Francisco -- U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder is sending strong signals that President Obama - who as a candidate said states should be allowed to make their own rules on medical marijuana - will end raids on pot dispensaries in California.

Asked at a Washington news conference Wednesday about Drug Enforcement Administration raids in California since Obama took office last month, Holder said the administration has changed its policy.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: eric; holder; marijuana; state
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: refermech
There is one small problem with the idea of anybody growing their own pot. The Attorney General didn't say he was going to change the law. That would take an act of Congress. He is stating policy, which can change as soon as the next Administration comes in. In essence the Attorney General is saying the federal government isn't going to enforce the laws that are in U.S. Code.

People that produce the pot, traffic the pot, sell the pot at the "dispensaries" will still be breaking federal law, they just won't have to worry about guys in raid jackets breaking down their doors, for a while. Simply put this is the drug version of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," and a complete cop out by the Administration

It will be interesting how a state like California deals with this limbo status. Are those "coffee shops" taxed specifically on dope sales or gross receipts. I'm sure California would like a bigger cut of that pie, since they already have state legislators talking about the increase in revenue from taxing pot. Can a state find itself in a legal bind trying to tax something that is effectively still a federal criminal enterprise.

Just something for the academic side of this discussion. Personally, I don't care what people do in their homes. When they peddle it on the streets, sell it to kids, and drive under the influence, I get pretty intolerant. I also reserve the right to not employ or work with anybody that does drugs. They aren't known for their peak performance anymore than alcohol abusers.

41 posted on 02/27/2009 12:21:53 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Either an axe-wielding homicidal maniac bent on violence, or a Cheeto’s eating couch potato.

Laundry must be a bitch for them - having to get both blood AND orange Chee-toh dust off your shirts.

42 posted on 02/27/2009 12:23:17 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MAD-AS-HELL

Gee... This takes all the fun out of being a compassionate-conservative. I’m going to miss arresting the sick, dying, and lame. And they were so-o-o easy to catch.


43 posted on 02/27/2009 12:24:48 PM PST by Lexington Green (Obama's DNA glistens on Chris Matthews' chin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

I agree with your take on this but I think that if a state loosens the controls for pot it will be a defacto legalization because they won’t put any resources into busting people. All in all I think it would be OK for the country as a whole.


44 posted on 02/27/2009 12:27:19 PM PST by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Califreak

45 posted on 02/27/2009 12:27:52 PM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: rigelkentaurus

maybe the silver lining is if all the RATS are doped up all the time, they will completely stop voting.
_______

LOL. How’d that work for you in the 2008 elections. Anyone wanting to smoke pot can find it already.

And this absurd notion that it is only Ds getting high just kills me.


46 posted on 02/27/2009 12:29:19 PM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Lexington Green

LOL your tagline is horrible but funny.


47 posted on 02/27/2009 12:30:07 PM PST by TheKidster (you can only trust government to grow, consolidate power and infringe upon your liberties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

On the other thread on this topic, pot smokers are compared to necrophiliacs.

So, after we axe murder folks, we have sex with their dead bodies, and having then worked up some serious munchies, sit on the couch eating Cheetos.


48 posted on 02/27/2009 12:31:22 PM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
Okay, no right. But you've got the same rationalizations all thieves do. Now let's say you intend to take what's mine and I don't want you to. What are you going to do about it?

49 posted on 02/27/2009 12:40:41 PM PST by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

“Perhaps the states can allow farmers to raise industrial hemp, too.”

no that’s too capitalist and doesn’t turn people into mindless zombies.


50 posted on 02/27/2009 12:41:00 PM PST by ari-freedom (Hail to the Dork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dmz

51 posted on 02/27/2009 12:41:09 PM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Somewhat related question, why did it take a constitutional amendment to ban alcohol, but not for marijuana?


52 posted on 02/27/2009 12:45:52 PM PST by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blonde

They “banned” reefer with tax laws. You can sell it if you have a tax stamp...err o yea they wont sell any tax stamps. They just didn’t invent that until after prohibition.


53 posted on 02/27/2009 12:51:46 PM PST by rsobin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blonde

You don’t need an amendment to make something illegal, although it is the toughest way to do it. That is just the way it was done with alcohol. An amendment is harder to overturn.


54 posted on 02/27/2009 12:58:21 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: dmz

I’m sure there are some dead lays over there, but I bet it ain’t the potsmokers.


55 posted on 02/27/2009 1:07:19 PM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: rsobin

Oddly enough, marijuana prohibition via tax stamp was modeled after...

...the method they used to do away with machine guns.


56 posted on 02/27/2009 1:09:42 PM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: All

We will not interfere with your pot laws; however, we will interfere with your gun laws. One thing I have discovered about liberals, they make stuff up as they go along.


57 posted on 02/27/2009 1:12:11 PM PST by Pelagius of Asturias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: txnativegop
Easier to control stoned people liberals than rational people.

Fixed it for you.

58 posted on 02/27/2009 1:52:28 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

true enough, but I don’t use the word liberals to describe the left anymore.

The root of the word liberal is liberty and they certainly don’t believe in liberty.


59 posted on 02/27/2009 1:55:03 PM PST by txnativegop (God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
The tough part will be for the DEA and the forest service that have to go clean up Mexican run grows in the national forests in states that legalize pot.

That makes no sense. If growing it is legalized there will be no need to hide it and the Mexican gangs would have no incentive to set up grow operations.

60 posted on 02/27/2009 1:57:07 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson