Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

Who DO you want?
And why should the rest of us roll over and accept YOUR pick?
Romney is more than acceptable, and he understand economics like nobody else that we could run.
Romney could very easily point out that it was Democrats who ran most of these financial firms into the ground, with help from the stupid Democrats in Washington.


11 posted on 02/26/2009 5:41:28 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Kansas58

Willard is a rat.
IT should join his real party the democrats!


24 posted on 02/26/2009 5:48:56 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ((B.?) Hussein (Obama?Soetoro?Dunhem?), change America will die for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Kansas58

I’m with ya, Kansas. And Mitt would have been excellent in trying to decipher this debacle we’re in now. Let’s hope the country is sick of 0bambi and votes him out in 2012.


37 posted on 02/26/2009 5:55:45 PM PST by Joann37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Kansas58
Romney is more than acceptable, and he understand economics like nobody else that we could run.

Plus he lives his life in a way that demonstrates conservative principles.

43 posted on 02/26/2009 6:04:29 PM PST by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Kansas58

Romney is more than acceptable, and he understand economics like nobody else that we could run.
Romney could very easily point out that it was Democrats who ran most of these financial firms into the ground, with help from the stupid Democrats in Washington.


I’m not a Romney supporter and wasn’t last time around. But in his defense he is doing the ground work now to be positioned for the race after the 2010 elections. He’s building up capital amongst the party which is more than some of the newly rising stars are doing. You can’t ignore the major party events or conservative get togethers and stay isolated in your state and expect to be in position to be a serious contender in 2010.

We had some good candidates in 08 but they didn’t have national recognition which takes time sometimes years to establish.


45 posted on 02/26/2009 6:05:09 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Kansas58
"Romney is more than acceptable, and he understand economics like nobody else that we could run."

Half a billion dollar bailout for his Utah hack friends to 'save' the Utah Olympics. Shoved Hilliary/Ted Kennedy socialist take over of private health care.

So, accepting what you said, and I do, Mitt is even worse in that he KNEW he was being a lefty socialist and that in both practical experience and theory, what he was doing was wrong.

Nice.

52 posted on 02/26/2009 6:09:15 PM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Kansas58

Well said.


75 posted on 02/26/2009 6:37:03 PM PST by NordP (CONSERVATIVE AGAIN IN 2010 ..... Now, is it 2012 yet ???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Kansas58
Kansas58 Romney could very easily point out that it was Democrats
who ran most of these financial firms into the ground, with help from the stupid Democrats in Washington.

Romney ran Massachusetts into the ground under his watch.

DNC-patsy GOP-Backstabber Socialist Carpetbagger Romney
imposing on Massachusetts (without a single citizen's vote)
both gay marriage (over the Clerk's protests that the Mass. Constitution did not allow such a change by the Courts)
and socialized medicine (ruining the Commonwealth's economy along with the Romney's taxes ("fees") and coverup of the BIGdig).

Myth Romney also got a "C" rating from CATO.
Liberal RINO Romney also betrayed President Bush (as TeamROMNEY would do in Election2008)
because Romney was against the conservative tax cuts proving the RomneyBOT wrong.
Here are the facts from CATO.

"As U.S. real output grew 13 percent between 2002 and 2006, Massachusetts trailed at 9 percent.
* Manufacturing employment fell 7 percent nationwide those years, but sank 14 percent under Romney, placing Massachusetts 48th among the states.
* Between fall 2003 and autumn 2006, U.S. job growth averaged 5.4 percent, nearly three times Massachusetts' anemic 1.9 percent pace.
* While 8 million Americans over age 16 found work between 2002 and 2006, the number of employed Massachusetts residents actually declined by 8,500 during those years.
"Massachusetts was the only state to have failed to post any gain in its pool of employed residents," professors Sum and McLaughlin concluded.
In an April 2003 meeting with the Massachusetts congressional delegation in Washington, Romney failed to endorse President Bush's $726 billion tax-cut proposal.

[Cato Institute annual Fiscal Policy Report Card - America's Governors, 2004.]

120 posted on 02/26/2009 7:23:42 PM PST by Diogenesis (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson