Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: codder too
“To encourage and promote diversity in communication media ownership, and to ensure that the public airwaves are used in the public interest.”

This is more frightening than the Fairness Doctrine. It is so vaugely worded that it can be interpreted any way that it suits them.

This just took the battleground and placed it in communities where you will see station owners exposed to a full onslaught of local groups doing the fearless leader's dirty work while the Dems spend time covering their own butts with their “denouncing” of the Fairness Doctrine.

Chris Stigall sat in last night for Savage and he put the ball squarely in the court of the station owners to get on top of this thing.

What a slippery bunch! We're going to have to go over all legislation with a fine tooth comb - which is more than our voted representatives in government do!

79 posted on 02/27/2009 7:24:18 AM PST by MWestMom (Tread carefully, truth lies here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: MWestMom

I thought this administration was going to be about government transparency?

The American people are almost in the dark as much as our legislators are. How sad.


80 posted on 02/27/2009 10:08:12 AM PST by leonid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson