Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tarpon

San Fran Nan isn’t completely stupid. When we look back at the ‘94 elections, the DNC lost no fewer than 21 seats to NOTHING OTHER THAN THE GUN ISSUE.

And they knew it. Their own internal polling told them this. There were members of the House that were buttonholing Schumer (who was in the house back then) and screaming at him “You did this to us!”

Pelosi knows that she could easily lose the Congress in ‘10 if she pulled a vote on this issue. Easily.

The campaign commercials would write themselves instantly - increases spending, increased taxes, more gun control, you name it - and it would be ‘94 all over again.

She might be talked into it by some of the rabid nitwits in the House... but one of Rahm’s formulas for their current dominance was to curry favor with more rural districts by recruiting pro-gun Democrats. As soon as Pelosi lets a big gun bill go through — even for those Democrats who vote against it - they’re in trouble.


23 posted on 02/26/2009 10:58:51 AM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: NVDave
The AW gun issue was responsible for over 50 wins in 1994, I was personally involved in 6 races, including defoleyate. None of the races I was working for were in the state where I lived, California. Even BJ Clinton said it cost him 56 House seats.

When you consider that the SC just ruled that the right to militia arms was guaranteed by the Second Amendment, this could be really a good thing.

The House is the best place to defeat Obama ... And individual groups can run radio ads made on their PC for cheap in local districts.

36 posted on 02/26/2009 11:09:09 AM PST by Tarpon (If you don't stand on principle, you stand for nothing at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson