Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AJKauf

Wow. Abstinence education is useless because most teens have sex anyway. (Never mind the 30% that chooses not to - abstinence education had no effect on them, of course. In fact, considering the counter-barrage teens get in the form of safe sex ed, free handouts, Planned Parenthood in schools etc, I’m amazed the abstinent percent is as high as it is.)

Using the author’s logic and examples, we shouldn’t bother to teach our kids to keep their hands out of the litter box, eat their vegetables, be honest, dress modestly, and not to drink, steal, cheat or have sex...because their very nature says they’ll probably do all that stuff anyway.

Silly me. I guess instead we should give our kids gloves for the litter box. Oh wait, we DO do that - they’re called condoms at that age.


88 posted on 02/25/2009 12:20:28 PM PST by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: agrace

Never mind the 30% that chooses not to - abstinence education had no effect on them, of course
_________

You cannot demonstrate that the 30% are abstinent because of the abstinence education. Numerous factors go into that percentage.


98 posted on 02/25/2009 12:32:27 PM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson