[utahson]

No you were attacking Jindal not McCain, good try.

[rabscuttle385]

No you were attacking Jindal not McCain, good try.

Your post (386) was in response to my post (276), which itself was a reply to a post by Miss Didi (265), which I quote as follows: "McCain will also be on Fox & Friends tomorrow morning to gush over Barry’s speech."

So, logically, when I used the masculine subjective pronoun "he" at post 276, one would assume that I'm replying to post 265, and thus, a reply to a remark about John McCain.

Unless, of course, Jindal was talking about working with Obama on health care, admitting a rush into TARP, and talking about Palin, as you implicitly claim.

So, which is it?

[jennyjenny]

IMHO, he wasn't, and I wasn't “attacking” Jindal. The Jindal we saw tonight is not the same Jindal we saw this past weekend and over the course of the last several months. I like Jindal, ALOT. I follow politics as much as most people on this board. He didn't perform well tonight. Yes, “perform”. Not the end of the world. I'm not writing him off because of this bad performance, but I'm also not going to deny is was not good. It wasn't. As I said previously, it will be forgotten by this Friday, if not by noon tomorrow. The focus will be back on Obama’s failure of a leadership tonight.

[roamer_1]

No you were attacking Jindal not McCain, good try.

ROTFLMAO!! Now Jindal is a "conservative"? Same old question:

How does Jindal (on his record) prove that he can harness all three pillars of Conservatism? If you cannot answer that question (which you cannot), then Jindal is not a Conservative.