So DC is reduced to tying to adopt the California list of approved handguns?
To: atomic_dog
2 posted on
02/24/2009 8:00:14 AM PST by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: atomic_dog
3 posted on
02/24/2009 8:11:13 AM PST by
ConservaTexan
(February 6, 1911)
To: atomic_dog
Arms or not there is no constitutional basis for DC to have a voting represntative in congress.
If the residents don’t like the constitution they should move to a place where they won’t have to cope with one.
Somalia will do.
4 posted on
02/24/2009 8:32:08 AM PST by
Iron Munro
(Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
To: atomic_dog
I'm curious as to why the state of California hasn't been challenged in court by the NRA or anyone else for the anti second amendment laws currently on the books. i.e.: banned sales of 50 caliber rifles, banned sales or possession by law abiding citizens of any weapon that looks (not functions like) the weapons carried by the BATF and other gov suppressive agencies, etc,
5 posted on
02/24/2009 8:33:11 AM PST by
drypowder
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
