Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

“Hasn’t happened yet.”

Theses cases have all been thrown out on the basis of LEGAL STANDING.

A SOLDIER expected to follow the LAWFUL ORDERS of the leadership DOES have the standing to demand to know if that leader is legitimate.

An UNLAWFUL leader cannot issue a LAWFUL ORDER!


64 posted on 02/23/2009 7:37:18 PM PST by tcrlaf ("Hope" is the most Evil of all Evils"-Neitzsche)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: tcrlaf
A SOLDIER expected to follow the LAWFUL ORDERS of the leadership DOES have the standing to demand to know if that leader is legitimate.

The orders will come from his company commander, his battalion commander, his brigade and division commanders. Are you suggesting they aren't legitimate?

115 posted on 02/24/2009 4:05:20 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: tcrlaf

You bet. The US military was involved up to its eyeballs at the Neurenberg trials. Punishing this dissenter will not make the brass look good at all.


125 posted on 02/24/2009 5:50:46 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson