[Non-Sequitur]

I stand corrected. I've been using 'damages' and 'injury' interchangably and I shouldn't have been. But what we can agree to, I hope, is that in order for Lt. Easterling to demonstrate standing then he needs to point out specifically how his legally protected interests have been harmed or injured in any way if Obama is shown to be constitutionally unqualified to be president. And I also hope that we can agree that these injuries have to be actual and not conjectural or hypothetical.

By extension, one cannot be required to do something by someone who does not have the standing to make you do it.

So we get back to the question, what is Obama forcing him to do?

[Yosemitest]

You're diverting from the issue. Obama is Constitutionally UNQUALIFIED!!!

[MindBender26]

That's up to the good Lieutenant, since if Obama has no right to tell him what to do, then anything he is forced to do at Obama’s behest is inappropriate if he wants call it so!

Seriously, Is this a filed matter?

Do we know AOR (Attorney Of Record?) Will they take a contribution?

[MindBender26]

And I also hope that we can agree that these injuries have to be actual and not conjectural or hypothetical.

His case now is for prevention, rather then compensation or redress.... and that certainly is an arguable case!