Your crazy.
Are you trying to tell us that a defendant doesn’t have standing?
Put down the bong.
I think you're confusing apples and oranges. You need legal standing to initiate a legal proceeding against someone, like Obama. In that case you're the plaintiff and this officer has to surmount the same hurdle that all the other cases have had, showing real damages suffered as a result of Obama's actions. If this officer decides on his own that Obama is a fraud and refuses to obey orders given to him by his superiors because of that then he's going to be on the receiving end. It'll be the military equivilent of a criminal trial, and if he tries to use as a defense that Obama isn't qualified to be president and tries to subpoena the birth certificat and all the rest then it'll be up to the presiding judge whether to allow it or not. I don't see that happening. But you keep holding out hope based on that and we'll see which of us is right.