Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Frantzie
It is not treason when you know he is not eligible.

Just curious here. I know for a fact that President Obama has not proven he is eligible, and that there is some concern his mother did not give birth in the US of A.

But does anyone actually KNOW that he is NOT eligible?

Don't get me wrong: I think all nominees for POTUS should have to prove their constitutional eligibility. He did not, and he should have, and still should. But there is no true evidence that he is not eligible, correct? I am not counting an elderly lady in Africa saying she witnessed his birth there - that could have been a misstatement.

110 posted on 02/24/2009 12:40:02 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Yaelle

“But does anyone actually KNOW that he is NOT eligible?”

We know he REFUSES to prove he IS eligible.


163 posted on 02/24/2009 8:27:30 AM PST by AmericanDave (All truth has 3 stages: 1st ridiculed; 2nd violently opposed; 3rd, Seen as obvious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

To: Yaelle
But does anyone actually KNOW that he is NOT eligible?

Yes. By Obama's own admission in his books and his fight the smears website. He affirms he is not eligible by virtue of his FATHER'S non-US citizenship status. Obama Sr. was a citizen of the UK, not the U.S. This has been hashed over and over on these threads. I suggest googling Leo Donofrio who presented an excellent summary of why this is so. Obama may be a citizen we really don't know - but natural born - no way unless both of his parents were citizens.

263 posted on 02/25/2009 6:51:13 AM PST by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson