Dr. Taitz's Military Action Welcomes' Officer Easterling

Defend Our Freedoms ^ | 2/23/2009 | rxsid

[mojitojoe]

I look at it this way, if the SCOTUS does not think a military officer has standing, we have already lost the battle and there is corruption all the way to and through the SC.

[mojitojoe]

If someone isn’t eventually found to “have standing,” it is going to come down to those of us who “are standing.”
_________________
AMEN to that

[mojitojoe]

Whoa!!!

Spel czeck shold bee mi frend.

Oye!
___________
Whoa, ok grammer whore, would you like to correct it? Spell check worked fine on here and just checked it again. Get a life

[mojitojoe]

People around the country and even here at FR have no idea how bad this guy is and how fast he will destroy the country.
_____________
I think they are beginning to see it now. Even dems that voted for him. Of course they blame the MSM for hiding things and I tell them, no excuse, do your homework and research before you vote. Don’t rely on the faux news.

[SandRat]

One 2LT soon to be wearing a Leavenworth Federal Prison jumpsuit with a white name tag while he awaits his appeal.

[SandRat]

No kidding. We got called baaaaaWAAAAK-bots and that was the kindest words used.

[SandRat]

Roger that!

[rxsid]

To be honest, humbly, I'm by no means the most knowledgeable in these Constitutional matters. I'm no lawyer either.

"I suspect there are many in government fully aware of what is happening, telling themselves that when his popularity has declined, perhaps then they'll join some group asking for a review Obamas Constitutional qualifications."

I suspect this as well. It's why I use Mark Twain's quote often (see earlier post here). This thing is gaining steam. Far from over. IMO, there will be many more Lt. Easterlings (that is, Active duty) that join in the suit.

As for how to 'support' these efforts, I can only tell you what I do. That is, financially support when and as much as I can to Dr. Taitz's cause (and others as well). Writing letters (emails are OK, but), actually taking some time out of my day to write a letter with supporting evidence (found on Orly's site, or Berg's, etc) and send such letters to my (so called) representatives, local, state and federal. I would also email the media. It may sound futile, but IMO, the repetition and the volume will eventually compel some in the media to start covering this...and some in elected positions to start questioning and hopefully even take part in such lawsuits (evidence more and more reps joining suit). This is an uphill battle, and will continue to be so for at least the near future. I, for one, will not give up and do what I can (above) to help.

Some good sources for media contacts:

http://www.americanreview.us/mediadd1.htm

http://saveourrights.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Contact_information

[rxsid]

"One 2LT soon to be wearing a Leavenworth Federal Prison jumpsuit with a white name tag while he awaits his appeal."

I'm curious as to why you believe that? Is there some military code of conduct link you could provide?

Thanks.

[SandRat]

begin with http://www.osc.gov/hatchact.htm

proceed to http://www.army.mil/references/UCMJ/

then go to http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=25721

[Old Sarge]

Does it matter what my opinion is, since you’ve sarcastically dismissed me already, like a typical conservative?

[truth_seeker]

“If Lt. Easterling is indeed court martialed for this act, it will create a flood of military people standing up in his stead.”

In the Army I served in, everybody was obliged to follow lawful orders from your superiors.

My guess is if this guy is otherwise following orders, doing his job day by day, the service may let it ride.

Best to not stir the pot.

Now if this 40 year old 1LT starts disoberying orders from his superiors, on the basis they come down from Obama, he will get in big trouble.

[rxsid]

So far as I can tell, there is nothing in any of those that pertains to being a plaintiff in a lawsuit questioning the Constitutionality of the POTUS.
Perhaps you could point to a specific provision or statute or law?

[Old Sarge]

Are you certain you yourself are on the right forum?

[rxsid]

"My guess is if this guy is otherwise following orders, doing his job day by day, the service may let it ride."

Exactly! So far as we know, he's NOT disobeying orders. Merely, he's a plaintiff in a lawsuit to seek proof Barry is Constitutionally qualified to give him military orders.

[SandRat]

For starters the use of his military rank.

He must file individually in a suit not as part of an identifiable political action.

There are words used in the “letter” that disparage the Pres. and that's an offense covered under the UCMJ.

There is also conduct unbecoming of an officer as well as conduct detrimental to the good order and discipline of the military both UCMJ offenses.

[PurpleMan]

I was refering to myself.

Sheesh.

Paxil

[Jean S]

“GET LOST”
Your debating skills are awesome.

[Jean S]

Non-Sequitur is not a DUer. You, being a newbie, are an unknown at FR. I would be very careful about the accusations that you are making.

[rxsid]

"For starters the use of his military rank." What do you mean here?

"He must file individually in a suit not as part of an identifiable political action." Do you have legal reference for this requirement? Or, is this your opinion?

"There are words used in the “letter” that disparage the Pres. and that's an offense covered under the UCMJ." Can you provide the wording and the UCMJ 'part' that would cover such wording?

"There is also conduct unbecoming of an officer as well as conduct detrimental to the good order and discipline of the military both UCMJ offenses." Same as above. Linking UCMJ offense to conduct unbecoming of an officer?