Exactly correct, thus those that try to shoe horn theology into the scientific method are rather daft. Science doesn't have the right tool set to address such issues.
I don't believe people who do this are silly or crazy, rather that it's just human nature to focus narrowly. A person dying of cancer, when he stubs his toe will instantly, wrongfully consider the toe his number one health problem.
IMHO, we all just need to back away, get our priorities straight (it's about the Creator not the creature) and look again at the forest of evidence, including both physical and non-physical.
“(Science) is just as far out its league to suggest there is no purpose as it is to suggest there is no God or indeed anything supernatural. The scientific method does not apply to such questions, science does not have the right toolset to address such questions.” Alamo-Girl
Exactly correct, thus those that try to shoe horn theology into the scientific method are rather daft. Science doesn’t have the right tool set to address such issues.
These things were said about speaking over a wire and hearing another human voice thousands of miles away...it’s just “black magic” and so on.
And who is that decides for everyone again what is or isn’t “science” the “scientific method”, etc.?
And how about shoehorning godless liberal ideology, does that count?