Skip to comments.
Congress Reconsiders the Fairness Doctrine (And why they shouldn't reinsate it)
Associated Content ^
| Feb 22, 2009
| Pricilla King
Posted on 02/22/2009 2:50:47 PM PST by Syncro
Congress Reconsiders the Fairness Doctrine
by Priscilla King
Should TV and Radio Be Free to Broadcast Political Content?
In 1949, the FCC adopted a rule called the Fairness Doctrine, which required broadcasters to give "equal time" to all sides of a political dispute. Like many efforts to create fairness by imposing "equality," this policy never worked in the way that was intended. Even when the Communist Party,... didn't demand time to broadcast their views, in practice it turned out that the mainstream parties could not always present equally successful broadcasts. If a successful Democrat's show couldn't be "balanced" by an equally successful Republican's show, the most commercially viable decision for the broadcaster was to replace both shows with yet another hour of popular songs.
The effect of the Fairness Doctrine was that most radio and TV stations simply banned shows with overtly political content. While conservatives complained that left-wing media personalities had become far too skilled at injecting political bias into what passed for music, drama, comedy, and even news shows, liberals complained that sponsors were censoring any full or fair presentation of left-wing views, and intellectuals complained that, rather than encouraging fair discussion, the commercial media were broadcasting nothing with substantial political or factual content of any kind.
In 1987, the Fairness Doctrine was repealed, and even daytime radio and TV shows were free to present detailed discussions of news events. The most obvious result was the rise of "talk show" superstars who did not merely moderate call-in "straw votes" or recite news headlines, but actually tried to discuss and analyze news events on the air. Rush Limbaugh and Oprah...
(Excerpt) Read more at associatedcontent.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; bho2009; censorshipdoctrine; communists; congress; demint; democratcongress; democrats; fairnessdoctrine; fcc; freespeech; jimdemint; liberals; limbaugh; localism; oprah; rush; senjimdemint; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: Montfort
My ..CongressIDIOT has stated outright that NPR is FAIR and BALANCED and has NO NEED to be Considered.
but then, this is the same Idiot that came on a RIGHTWING Talk station, and Connected enough dots to BLAME the HOST for Causing 9/11.
And in my County .. he’s a Moderate.
21
posted on
02/22/2009 4:07:40 PM PST
by
gwilhelm56
(WE THE PEOPLE Demand TALK RADIO to be our 1st Amendment MEDIA WATCHDOG!!!)
To: Syncro
Repealing the “””””fairness doctrine””” for the libs was fine... until it gave birth to ....RUSH!!! They’ve hated it ever since.
To the HATERS.. which part of ..”CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW” do you Orwellian THOUGHT POLICE not Understand???
22
posted on
02/22/2009 4:10:32 PM PST
by
gwilhelm56
(WE THE PEOPLE Demand TALK RADIO to be our 1st Amendment MEDIA WATCHDOG!!!)
To: gwilhelm56
And I saw an interview with Helen Thomas the other day where she said she has never seen another liberal news person, that she is all alone in the category.
These people have seared brains.
It's amazing how many liberals say that the media is almost 100% slanted towards conservatives.
Give me a break, tingle tingle little Chrissie Matthews, how I wonder what you are.
23
posted on
02/22/2009 4:19:16 PM PST
by
Syncro
(Ti Ming -- Use Librally)
To: Kackikat
It should be referred to as censorship in the form of the UNFAIR Fairness Doctrine. It should be called what it is - butting in on your right to listen to what you wanna.
24
posted on
02/22/2009 5:06:39 PM PST
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(Change is what journalism is all about. NATURALLY journalists favor "change.")
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
25
posted on
02/23/2009 10:06:16 AM PST
by
Kackikat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson