You think that because someone chooses to stash a few weapons and ammo (just in case) that these people are in favor of starting a shootemup war?
What are you? a gun grabber?
You said — “You think that because someone chooses to stash a few weapons and ammo (just in case) that these people are in favor of starting a shootemup war?”
It’s not my statement about an armed revolution that I’m talking about. I’ve already made it clear, on my behalf, that I’m not about to participate in any way, fashion or form, in an armed revolution — but only — by means of the political mechanisms...
So, I’m giving you what others here have said to me... You can take that any way you want.
—
You then asked — “What are you? a gun grabber?”
No, I’m in full support of all of the Bill of Rights, including the one on one’s rights to have them. That’s fine.
The part that I’m not about to support, is an armed revolution — and in light of the statement up above that you asked “why was it necessary to say” -— it’s because of that — that I reply that I’ll *only* be participating in “political mechanisms” to make changes and not any armed revolution using any of the guns or ammo that I possess (of which possession of such is in the Bill of Rights, all of them which I support).
You can see — now — why someone had to say (up above) —
“We need to be perfectly clear that by “stopping” him we mean using political means to stop his political agenda.”
It’s already headed down that “track” right now... (in this thread...) LOL...
Anyone who pays attention to ST is stepping in steaming piles. It/they is a disruptor, plain and simple. I am not pinging it/them because it/them is not a conservative and is here to disrupt.