I don’t understand why they would try to discredit the person, rather than what they’re trying to say.
If people see you obsessively trying to attack a person, rather than shooting as many holes in their argument as possible, wouldn’t they then start to believe that the first party’s argument is weak?
The election should have been one's first notion that 50% of the US public cannot vote based upon intelligence or knowledge of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. What makes one think they can make the decision that Keyes is correct when speaking specifics about Obama? I'm going after the bumper sticker
FUBO