You’re not doing anyone any favors. you’d do yourself a favor to respond the points made rather than to stifle discussion by attempting to ridicule posters who think the law is important.
By your own admission, you didn’t “read” the piece - which was obvious anyway b/c it’s a video.
There is nothing preventing you from allowing yourself the freedom to rationalize broken laws - go ahead = continue to knock yourself out.
But it’s a little silly to mock others for their belief in the rule of law.
At the risk of sounding all mockulatory, I do believe in the rule of law but I don't believe the LA Times does.
I will make this prediction though.
The day after President Sarah Palin takes the oath of office in Jan., 2017, the left-wing media will quietly reveal that they knew all along that Soetoro.....errrr....I mean Obama.....was Constitutionally disqualified from being Present.
Actually, now that I think about it, what the left-wing media will argue is that since Obamalamadingdong is not Constitutionally qualified to be Present, he's not Constitutionally bound to serving only two terms.
Dammit. I shouldn't go giving them ideas. But, hell, it's out there now.
You can all send me nasty-grams when the time comes. I deserve it.