And the same agents who had never shown any dispensation to do harm to anyone suddenly change their manner of human interaction?
This is the statement I was responding to which prompted my curiosity about Ramos and domestic abuse. Any dispensation?
All this Ramos/Compean discussion really isn’t the topic of this thread but it got interjected early on. My belief is that this situation in Santa Teresa is different from the Ramos/Compean fiasco and will be treated differently as it appears that the FBI is involved.
We don’t have much info to judge what happened in this case but it seems the shooting was acknowledged by the agents involved, one agent apparently was assualted by the drug smuggler so we have an upfront ongoing investigation apparently without coverup from the participating parties. We’ll see.
Haha. That too. I meant disposition.
The situation is definitely different, but as in the other cases I mentioned, the federal government actively pursued their own.
The Ramos and Compean case is special to me since I was challenged to read the testimony and come to a conclusion. I did so. I have also travelled to the site. I drove over the route from Fabens to the ditch. I measured the ditch to verify the conclusions I had drawn from the testimony. I conclude that the jury was dead wrong in believing the testimonies of Juarez and Vasquez. Then the judgement is entirely whether you believe Davila, the drug runner, or Ramos and Compean. I believe the officers. Since I believe that an officer eating lunch at the office and then participating in a continuous chase measured in minutes and seconds has no measureable time to plot and coordinate a crime and its coverup with a cohort who is miles away until the final few seconds of the event.