Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Times Settles With Lobbyist Over McCain (Affair) Story
New York Lawyer ^ | 02/20/09 | By Marisa McQuilken

Posted on 02/20/2009 11:34:03 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines

WASHINGTON - Alcalde & Fay partner Vicki Iseman has settled her $27 million defamation lawsuit against The New York Times and several of its reporters.

Iseman, a Washington lobbyist, sued the Times over a story published last February during the presidential campaign season that she claimed inaccurately depicted her as having an affair with Republican candidate Sen. John McCain.

Iseman says, "I am pleased that The New York Times on behalf of its reporters, editors and company has issued a retraction and clarification."

Iseman’s statement continues, "The New York Times, its reporters and editors, should and must be held accountable when their investigations, reporting, and written words migrate from legitimate to illegitimate with the affect of destroying human beings based on innuendos, rumors and the reckless attributions of 'anonymous sources.'"

Iseman filed the lawsuit in December in federal court in Richmond, Va.

(Excerpt) Read more at nylawyer.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008electionbias; actualmalice; dnctalkingpoints; fakebutaccurate; iseman; lawsuit; lyingliars; mcain; mediabias; pravdamedia; smearcampaign; times; waronerror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 02/20/2009 11:34:05 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

I wonder how much dough she got?


2 posted on 02/20/2009 11:36:42 AM PST by RexBeach ("Do your duty in all things." Robert E. Lee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Did she just get an apology and a retraction or was there also a monetary settlement?


3 posted on 02/20/2009 11:37:27 AM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

I hadn’t even known she’d filed suit. I hope she took them to the cleaners.


4 posted on 02/20/2009 11:41:23 AM PST by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

I hope she took those SOBs to the cleaners


5 posted on 02/20/2009 11:42:01 AM PST by cups
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Timesink; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; ...

Media Schadenfreude and Media Shenanigans PING


6 posted on 02/20/2009 11:47:57 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Mr. President, Why am I being punished with a bailout?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

She better insist on getting the money real fast.


7 posted on 02/20/2009 11:49:19 AM PST by Tribune7 (Obama wants to put the same crowd that ran Fannie Mae in charge of health care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: detective

If The NYet Times had good lawyers, they are paying her off in worthless stock options.


8 posted on 02/20/2009 11:49:25 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Mr. President, Why am I being punished with a bailout?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Unfortunately, the ‘retraction’ was wishy-washy and included continued McCain bashing (any Republican bashing opportunity is a good one to the NYT), a side email to New Yuk Times employees was extremely unflattering of the good Ms Iceman, and in no small measure, NYT continues to ‘show no remorse’ as is usually required of criminals who want to be recognized as civilized. Only good news yesterday was that NYT slashed its dividend, making paupers of the Sulzbergers, who now have no reason not to sell out!


9 posted on 02/20/2009 11:52:39 AM PST by CRBDeuce (here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Well, we don’t know if she got a payoff or not, because usually one of the conditions of such payoffs is that the recipients can’t talk about it.


10 posted on 02/20/2009 11:54:44 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

Hopefully it was all cash and not stock :)


11 posted on 02/20/2009 11:59:36 AM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mass55th; cups
I hope she took them to the cleaners.

Hear, hear.

12 posted on 02/20/2009 12:00:23 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

The Old Gay Lady, up to her usual tricks...


13 posted on 02/20/2009 12:10:32 PM PST by an amused spectator (Obama: Beware of geeks bearing grifts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CRBDeuce

But I thought “it’s just sex”!!!

Hrumph Hrumph Hrumph


14 posted on 02/20/2009 12:11:28 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Mr. President, Why am I being punished with a bailout?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
How much?! It is in the public interest to know!

Well, maybe we can force them to tell us when they accept their government bailout in the coming months.

15 posted on 02/20/2009 12:12:52 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

I read that she settled without receiving any cash.

The NY retraction is hilarious.


16 posted on 02/20/2009 12:23:12 PM PST by freespirited (Help save humanity. Cure the RINOvirus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

I hope she didn’t take stock in her settlement. All cash in lump sum.


17 posted on 02/20/2009 12:36:22 PM PST by Islander7 (If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
I wonder how much dough she got?

They offered her stock and she said she'd take the apology.

18 posted on 02/20/2009 12:36:49 PM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution - 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

How much money could she get from a penny stock paper?


19 posted on 02/20/2009 12:55:03 PM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

That was fast...


20 posted on 02/20/2009 2:27:13 PM PST by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson