Pointing out problems and objections in one theory is not the same thing as building an alternative theory.
Trying to pick holes in evolution doesn’t make creationism a science.
Correct. Facts and evidence do. And there are plenty of both. Let them be heard!
==Trying to pick holes in evolution doesn’t make creationism a science.
True enough. But if those wholes are being picked based on the hypothesis that the biblical account of creation and the noaitic flood are true, then it’s science. For instance: creationists predict that the earth is young, they predict not a tree of life, but an orchard of trees with no transitionals outside the bounds of the biblical kinds; they predict evidence of a global flood, etc, etc. They are forming hypothesis, and they are testing the same using the scientific method. That’s science.