Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Manas Air Base ‘Not Irreplaceable,’ Official Says
American Forces Press Service ^ | Staff Sgt. Michael J. Carden, USA

Posted on 02/19/2009 3:59:16 PM PST by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Feb. 19, 2009 – Kyrgyzstan’s parliament voted today to close Manas Air Base, a key logistics hub for the U.S. military, but a senior Pentagon official said the base closure would not affect operations in Afghanistan.

“[Manas Air Base] is an important base for operations in Afghanistan, but it’s not irreplaceable,” Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman told reporters here today. “If it’s not available to us, we’ll find other means.”

Kyrgyz President Kurmanbek Bakiyev still must sign the bill for the eviction to be official. If he signs the bill, troops will have 180 days to withdraw, based on a previous agreement made by the U.S. and Kyrgyz governments, he said.

Pentagon officials are aware of news reports that Bakiyev intends to close the base, Whitman said, but the United States hasn’t received any official notification or orders to withdraw its military forces. “Our operations there today remain normal,” he said.

Defense Department officials are considering what it may be able to offer the Kyrgyz government to continue operations, but will not agree to any price, Whitman said. Other options in the region are being considered, he said, but he would not give specifics on countries or the status of discussions.

“We remain in close contact with allies in the region,” he said.

Russia and Kazakhstan reportedly have given the United States permission to transport nonlethal equipment and supplies by train into Afghanistan. Uzbekistan and Tajikistan also reportedly are being considered.

The United States pays $17.4 million a year to use Manas Air Base, a major logistical and refueling hub supporting international troops in Afghanistan. The United States and Kyrgyzstan signed a “protocol of intentions” in 2006 that allowed the United States to renew the arrangement in one-year increments through July 2011. The air base has been facilitating U.S. troops since 2001, shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks.

About 15,000 people and 500 tons of cargo transit through Manas each month. About 1,000 troops, most of them American, but some from France and Spain, are assigned to the base.

President Barack Obama authorized 17,000 more troops this week to reinforce international forces in Afghanistan, and Whitman said there will be no disruption in current or future operations there.

“The announcements we made are going to go forward with no disruption,” he said. “If we are no longer permitted to use that base, we will start to transition our activities elsewhere.”

Related Sites:
Manas Air Base
State Department Background Note on Kyrgyzstan


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; frwn; kyrgyzstan; manasafb; pakastan; supplies; tajikistan; uzbekistan

1 posted on 02/19/2009 3:59:16 PM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clive; girlangler; fanfan; 91B; HiJinx; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; ...
FR WAR NEWS!
If you would like to be added to / removed from FRWN,
please FReepmail Sandrat.

WARNING: FRWN can be an EXTREMELY HIGH-VOLUME PING LIST!!

2 posted on 02/19/2009 4:00:22 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
If it is not irreplaceable why did we build it in a place where we could be tossed out?

And how many Billions did we expend to build the Base and bribe the Pols in the first place. Just more crap/corruption/mismanagement in the conduct of these necessary wars.

3 posted on 02/19/2009 4:07:02 PM PST by TCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
"Russia and Kazakhstan reportedly have given the United States permission to transport nonlethal equipment and supplies by train into Afghanistan. Uzbekistan and Tajikistan also reportedly are being considered."

Neither Russia nor Kazakhstan share a border with Afghanistan. They have to make nice with either Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, or Turkmenistan. It isn't optional.

They should never have allowed the loony left to get us thrown out of Uzbekistan.

4 posted on 02/19/2009 4:30:12 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TCats
...why did we build it in a place where we could be tossed out?

We didn't build it. It's a civilian airport we're putting to military use along with all the regular non-military traffic.

5 posted on 02/19/2009 4:32:25 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson