Posted on 02/19/2009 12:22:24 PM PST by DirtyHarryY2K
Ervin Gonzalez told his fellow Florida Bar Board of Governors members: “If you frame the issue of what this is really about, we are all in favor of this request. The goal is putting children first. It’s not an endorsement of an alternative lifestyle.”
In less than a half hour, on January 30 in Tallahassee, the Board of Governors voted unanimously (with one recusal) to allow the Family Law Section to file an amicus brief supporting 11th Circuit Judge Cindy Lederman’s November 25, 2008, decision to declare F.S. §63.042(3) unconstitutional and to allow homosexual foster parents to adopt two brothers they had nurtured for four years.
(Excerpt) Read more at floridabar.org ...
The membership railed against this previously. The family law section wants to allow the overturning of Florida’s prohibition on homosexuals adopting children. (it has stood three challenges: two state supreme court cases and one 11th DCA federal case, USSC appeal denied)
Even though no money is going to be used, these homsexual advocates are cashing in on the credibility of the florida bar. This is the same excuse they tried and failed before. Now they are doing what the left always does, they are circumventing the legislature and going back to the courts now that there has been new judges put on the bench.
The Florida Bar
651 E. Jefferson Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2300
(850) 561-5600
President of Florida Bar
John G. White, III
president@flabar.org
comments to the florida bar news are sent to this link:
rtraynor@flabar.org
mkkillian@flabar.org
Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
Checkout: http://SilencingChristians.com
Ervin Gonzalez told his fellow Florida Bar Board of Governors members: “If you frame the issue of what this is really about, we are all in favor of this request. The goal is putting children first. It’s not an endorsement of an alternative lifestyle
What liberal idiotic nonsense.
If you are really concerned for children you would never place them with admitted perverts.
Why stop at homosexuals? Why not rapists, or known drug addicts ?
By placing a child in a homosexual enviroment you are indeeed endorsing the homo lifestyle.
But you are not
The goal is putting children first.
No, it is not. - You do not put them "first" by teaching by such example.
It’s not an endorsement of an alternative lifestyle.”
Yes, it is.
Just like Obama and other Marxists -- they will say anything, including blatant falsehoods, in order to get their agenda through. This obviously has nothing to do with putting children first (a mother and a father is best for a child, all other things being equal), and has everything to do with endorsing an alternative lifestyle.
This doesn’t surprise me as family lawyers are notoriously Demorats.
The proper stance for a bar association is to take no stance. There is no one “proper” stance for a Florida lawyer to take on this contentious political issue.
I found how the World had been misled by prostitute
Writers, to ascribe the greatest Exploits in War to
Cowards, the wisest Counsel to Fools, Sincerity to
Flatterers, Roman Virtue to Betrayers of their Country,
Piety to Atheists, Chastity to Sodomites, Truth to
Informers.
(III:8;5)
Here I discovered the secret Causes of many great Events
that have surprized the World, how a Whore can Govern the
Back-stairs, the Back-stairs a Council, and the Council a
Senate.
(III:8)
There was a society of men among us, bred up from their
youth in the art of proving by words multiplied for the
purpose, that white is black and black is white, according
as they are paid.
(IV:5)
All in “Gulliver’s Travels” by Jonathan Swift.
pigs, all of them.
Who better than a couple of gay males when it comes to rearing young boys?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.