Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pilot Action May Have Led to Crash
The Wall Strett Journal ^ | FEBRUARY 18, 2009 | J. LYNN LUNSFORD and ANDY PASZTOR

Posted on 02/19/2009 5:19:10 AM PST by GBA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: jwparkerjr
With these reports, it's rare that the official cause isn't “Pilot error.” Still...hard to know why he seemed to do something so counter to training and experience without knowing what they were flying through at that moment. I've been in weather that took the plane all over the place, sudden 2000 fpm climbs despite all efforts to descend and vice versa, riding it out until you get through it, not so good when you're low and slow. Add the PIC’s inexperience in type, night IFR in weather with icing, etc.
21 posted on 02/19/2009 6:15:01 AM PST by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 6SJ7
Stalling? Add power, drop the nose, add power, drop the nose. How in hell could someone get a commercial pilot license and not be trained to the point of instinct to react properly to a stall condition?

Did you watch the video posted above? If it was a tail stall, the reaction has to be opposite of a normal wing stall. If it was a tail stall, pulling power and pulling the yoke is absolutely the right thing to do.

The horizontal stabilizer is a wing that produces downward lift. If it stalls, the downward lift to the rear of the aircraft goes away, leading to a nose-over, and the tail stall is worse with higher power.

22 posted on 02/19/2009 6:21:25 AM PST by Big Giant Head (I should change my tagline to "Big Giant penguin on my Head")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere
“Was he flying the plane....? Or was it the 24 yr old woman?....just asking”

And the average age of a pilot in the military is?

Point I'm making is what does her age have to do with it? We have a sky full of 23, 24, 25, 26 years olds men and women, protecting our butts, and they are strapping on aircraft much more complex than this commuter plane.

23 posted on 02/19/2009 6:27:31 AM PST by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GBA

24 posted on 02/19/2009 6:31:54 AM PST by downwdims (The Borrower is Slave to the Lender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GBA
Below is a photo of the pilot, Capt. Marvin Renslow (left) and his family, Kaley, 12, Sandy, and Tyler, 17. While it was a stupid mistake and the accident his fault, the copilot shared some responsibility as backup. She should have noticed and called out the slow airspeed no matter her seniority. She was recently a pilot instructor to build air time and this scenario must have happened to her in the right seat many times. The reason for a co-pilot is two heads are supposed to be better than one.


25 posted on 02/19/2009 6:36:35 AM PST by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere
My appreciation for the competence, skills, courage, dedication & experience of Captain Sullenberger continues to grow.

You need to be willing to pay for experience, most of these regionals won't. According to Airline Pilot Central the first officer, who most likely had less than a years experience, was making $21 an hour for a 75 hour work month. Do the math, that's about $1600 per month. The pilot made maybe double that. Sullenburger probably makes between $150 and $200K.

26 posted on 02/19/2009 6:37:39 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Big Giant Head

I’m still trying to figure this out. If it was a normal icing condition, and stall, there would be no reason to pull back on the stick. Shoving the throttles forward would be correct, and pushing forward on the stick.

If it was indeed a tail stall, there would be lots of reason to pull back on the stick because the pilot would have suddenly found himself pointing at the ground. If that was the case, pulling back on the stick was correct, but he over did it, to overcome the stick-shaker thing. Adrenaline? He pushed the throttles forward which would be correct for a normal wing stall, though.

A micro-timeline of what happened when would help. Did he pulled back too hard, THEN pushed the throttles forward?

None of this makes sense without more information.


27 posted on 02/19/2009 6:38:04 AM PST by Big Giant Head (I should change my tagline to "Big Giant penguin on my Head")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
Most grand pianos don’t have jet engines strapped to them

Your inane comments annoy me. Grand Pianos don't generate lift either.

Are you a pilot? Have you ever flown an airplane? The plane supposedly pancaked into the ground. Hmmm. Let's see. What direction would the engine thrust be if the plane pancaked. Did you study physics? I mean real physics, not the stuff they teach in high school?

ML/NJ

28 posted on 02/19/2009 6:40:48 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr
“why in the world the pilot would pull back on the stick if he realized his airspeed had gotten too low”

Check out the NASA film on tailplane stalls via the link provided in the original site's comments section. Another commenter suggested pitot icing may very well have caused inaccurate airspeed reading.

29 posted on 02/19/2009 6:45:16 AM PST by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY ( The Constitution needs No interpreting, only APPLICATION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

She had more experience.


30 posted on 02/19/2009 6:46:41 AM PST by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY ( The Constitution needs No interpreting, only APPLICATION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Big Giant Head

He may have mistook the stall warning as the ground proximity alarm. They were flying IFR and couldn’t see the ground or horizon. It’s natural to want to climb too fast after an aborted approach. Instead the pilot is trained to gain speed, slowly retract flaps, and go easy on the initial climb.


31 posted on 02/19/2009 6:47:04 AM PST by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere
Was he flying the plane....? Or was it the 24 yr old woman?....

As opposed to the autopilot. I also wonder where his co-pilot was in all of this. When you're low and slow you tend to pay A LOT of attention to airspeed. Of course, airspeed is something your instruments sense, and if they are wrong then you have to recognize that they are wrong. I don't know anything about the aircraft involved here. I only flew single engine stuff, but a lot of instrument training for me was about recognizing bad data from the instruments.

ML/NJ

32 posted on 02/19/2009 6:48:27 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
this makes it sound like the pilot had personal problems and a big life insurance policy ...

From other articles I've read there is speculation that he was following the procedures for a tail stall in the type of aircraft he used to fly.

33 posted on 02/19/2009 6:50:02 AM PST by Moonman62 (I didn't compromise my soul to be popular. -- Jimmy Carter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pfflier
402.5 feet @ 5 seconds

You must know G to a lot more decimal places than I do !

ML/NJ

34 posted on 02/19/2009 6:55:26 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BraveMan

After watching the film, it appears the pilots did everything they should have; they just didn’t have the altitude to recover.


35 posted on 02/19/2009 7:04:11 AM PST by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY ( The Constitution needs No interpreting, only APPLICATION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
Did you study physics?

Yeah, and your estimate of terminal velocity is wrong. As is your idea that a plane 'pancaking' will generate any lift.
36 posted on 02/19/2009 7:06:05 AM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo
Your point is well taken, but aren't these 23, 24, 25, 26 yr old Top Guns learning & gathering experience( as Sullenberger did when he was in the Air Force)& honing their flying 'wisdom' and tenure...

..and then, after much time, service & accumulated flying hours... used all that experience to fly the commercial jets loaded with people.

37 posted on 02/19/2009 7:16:47 AM PST by Guenevere ("He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain that which he cannot lose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Yes I have flown airplanes.

And who, exactly, said the the plane “pancaked” into the ground (i.e. fell straight down, flat on its belly).

If the engines/propellors are generating thrust, and the plane’s attitude ends up nose down, which quite often happens after a stall, then the plane will accelerate towards the ground at a rate greater than that caused by the force of gravity alone.

PS - Thank you for letting me know that my inane comments annoy you, your highness, that means they have achieved their desired result. ;^)


38 posted on 02/19/2009 7:17:48 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

The first thing that gets drilled into a Student Naval Aviator during instrument training is to trust the aircraft instruments over the seat of the pants. In fact, the way to overcome spacial disorientation (vertigo) is to get back on the instument scan and trust the instruments. Airspeed, attitude, needle ball.

There are a lot of dead pilots who failed to trust their instruments in the clag.


39 posted on 02/19/2009 7:17:58 AM PST by Francis McClobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: starlifter
But a piano doesn't have motors

OK. If you dropped a player piano....

40 posted on 02/19/2009 7:19:30 AM PST by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson