Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy

CO2 is not a pollutant.


11 posted on 02/18/2009 11:46:11 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Eric in the Ozarks
CO2 is not a pollutant.



DENIER!!

;-)

25 posted on 02/18/2009 11:55:19 AM PST by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

“CO2 is not a pollutant”

Exactly. One of the things that bothers me the most about the CO2 global warming hoopla, is that it diverts attention from pollution problems that are real. For example, if Obama were to complain about the toxic chemicals involved as a byproduct of oil production in the Alberta Oil Sands, so that we need to proceed very carefully, with adequate pollution controls, in the production of oil from our own oil sands, at least it would be a real issue.


43 posted on 02/18/2009 12:17:07 PM PST by Texan Tory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
CO2 is not a pollutant.

In trace amounts it isn't a problem. What is a little scary is when they talk about carbon capture or sequestration - concentrating the carbon, storing underground, etc. Carbonic acid can contaminate water supplies. Carbonic acid itself is not a serious contaminant, but it can dissolve other minerals and metals which could be more of a problem. Also, what if there was a mass release of the CO2? Accidental releases have the potential to kill. Beware the unintended consequences.

54 posted on 02/18/2009 12:46:55 PM PST by JTHomes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson