Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Obama Is Doing With Your Medical Records
Townhall.com ^ | February 18, 2009 | Terence Jeffrey

Posted on 02/18/2009 4:25:53 AM PST by Kaslin

The so-called "stimulus" President Obama signed Tuesday is so unwieldy it had to be posted in two PDFs on the House Appropriations Committee's Website along with another two containing an "explanatory statement."

The law totaled 1,071 pages; the explanation, 421.

Yet, 216 of the law's 1,071 pages deal with a project not directly aimed at short-term economic stimulus, and these 216 pages were themselves divided into two distinct parts (139 pages in "Division A" of the law and 77 pages in "Division B").

Together, these 216 pages provide the legal framework for collecting every American's personal medical records into a federally coordinated electronic system.

As first pointed out in a Feb. 9 Bloomberg.com commentary by former New York Lt. Gov. Betsy McCaughey, it is reasonable to assume that this electronic-records system, together with a provision that creates a "Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research," sets the stage for the creation of a nationalized health-care system that engages in British-style rationing.

But even if Congress and the president restrain themselves and pass no further law in pursuit of socialized medicine for the United States, the provisions already enacted in this law raise significant questions about the right to privacy and the right of doctors to practice medicine according to their best judgment.

Division A includes a section called "Title XIII -- Health Information Technology," which provides for "the development of a nationwide health information technology infrastructure."

In the law's jargon, this infrastructure is supposed to allow for the "enterprise integration" of the "qualified electronic health record" of "each person in the United States by 2014."

What do "qualified electronic health record" and "enterprise integration" mean? A "qualified electronic health record," the law says, "means an electronic record of health-related information on an individual that -- (A) includes patient demographic and clinical health information, such as medical history and problems lists; and (B) has the capacity -- (i) to provide clinical decision support; (ii) to support physician order entry; (iii) to capture and query information relevant to health care quality; and (iv) to exchange electronic health information with, and integrate such information from other sources."

This mandate that your "electronic health record" (EHR) be able to communicate with "other sources" goes to the definition of "enterprise integration." This term, the law says, "means the electronic linkage of health care providers, health plans, the government and other interested parties to enable electronic exchange and use of health information among all the components in the health care infrastructure in accordance with applicable law."

The law directs an existing bureaucracy created by President Bush (the "Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology") to put together a plan for building this system so that it achieves the "utilization of an electronic health record for each person in the United States by 2014."

In plain English: Over the next five years, the Obama administration intends to create a federally run electronic exchange that includes every American's "medical history and problems lists."

Now, before you run out to the nearest federal office and sign up to put the "medical history and problems" lists for yourself, your spouse and your children into the government's "nationwide health information technology infrastructure," you should know the law does not require you -- as an individual -- to do this.

The "explanatory statement" for Division A explains this. "To the extent that this section calls the national coordinator to ensure that every person in the United States have an EHR by 2014, this goal is not intended to require individuals to receive services from providers that have electronic health records and is aimed at having the national coordinator takes steps to help providers adopt electronic health records," says the explanation. "This provision does not constitute a legal requirement on any patient to have an electronic health record."

But if the national coordinator cannot make you -- an individual -- submit your records to the system, how is the poor guy going get "an electronic health record for each person in the United States by 2014"?

This mystery created by 139 pages in Division A is solved by the 77 pages in Division B: The secretary of health and human services is given a carrot and stick to make doctors and hospitals create EHRs for their patients. Doctors and hospitals that make "meaningful use" of EHRs by the deadline get bonus payments from Medicare. Those that do not get diminishing Medicare payments.

What is "meaningful use"? That is at the discretion of the secretary of HHS, but the law says it will include "electronic prescribing," "the electronic exchange of health information to improve the quality of health care" and submitting information "on such clinical quality measures and such other measures as selected by the secretary."

Lastly, the law directs the secretary to ratchet up the "meaningful use" test as time goes on. Or as the "explanation" politely puts it: "The secretary would seek to improve the use of electronic health records and health care quality by requiring more stringent measures of meaningful use over time."

In other words, once the secretary has your medical file in the system, he is supposed to make your doctor do ever more with it at his command.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: 111th; agenda; bho44; bhohealthcare; lping; obamacare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 02/18/2009 4:25:54 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
profiling...simple,illegal, and expected
2 posted on 02/18/2009 4:28:17 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

A very astute observation!


3 posted on 02/18/2009 4:30:48 AM PST by prismsinc (A.K.A. "The Terminator"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He is like Slick Willie in one respect, he buries his true intent in huge documents that nobody but a lawyer who wrote it cold possibly understand.

Like the license agreements you sign when you say YES for the new software package. No one reads them, understands them, or comprehends how bad they are. But they sign them none the less.


4 posted on 02/18/2009 4:33:30 AM PST by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

.


5 posted on 02/18/2009 4:35:47 AM PST by KoRn (Autumn Has Come To The Tree of Liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Mark my words, they will use these records to further infringe on your 2nd Amendment rights as well.


6 posted on 02/18/2009 4:40:11 AM PST by panthermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Life insurance companies will have a field day too.


7 posted on 02/18/2009 4:47:27 AM PST by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: panthermom

Were I paranoid, I would severely limit my use of the medical system for as long as possible.


8 posted on 02/18/2009 4:51:19 AM PST by reformedliberal (N0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Big blue had a huge flash page on its website the day of the inaugeration extolling this new “era.”

Do they stand to gain? Hell, yeah! http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/index.wss/industry/imc/a1000056?re=gihome67hcls


9 posted on 02/18/2009 4:56:07 AM PST by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Maybe it’s time for everyone to become John Smith.


10 posted on 02/18/2009 4:58:25 AM PST by Paladin2 (No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

2014. Right about when I planned to quit practicing medicine anyway. Another reason to spend more time on the beach....


11 posted on 02/18/2009 5:03:26 AM PST by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Requiescat In Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Womb to Tomb. The tomb of the unknown patient. Compassionate collectivists. Paging Jack Kervorkian.


12 posted on 02/18/2009 5:17:55 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Maybe it’s time for everyone to become John Smith.

No, Juan Martinez! How will the system handle all the illegals? They either have no ID or fake ID, so Garbage in Garbage out......

13 posted on 02/18/2009 5:20:51 AM PST by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: panthermom
Mark my words, they will use these records to further infringe on your 2nd Amendment rights as well.

Of course. Why are doctors asking you if you own guns? Let's see...you answer "yes," and they have your name and address. Voila! Gun owner registration.

14 posted on 02/18/2009 5:31:34 AM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
What's next? Tattooing a Medical ID Number on everyone? Need a method to provide the Medical ID number when there is no other means of communicating. And of course we would not want people to 'cheat' the system and obtain more health care then economically fair.

Now that we have the Medical ID number tattooed to our body, what else can the government use the ID to address???

15 posted on 02/18/2009 5:33:06 AM PST by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lockbox

Good Point. Juan Valdez I’ll be.


16 posted on 02/18/2009 5:37:27 AM PST by Paladin2 (No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

No kidding. Don’t go to the doctor. Especially for anything resembling depression, anxiety etc. They’ll probably microchip you like a dog!


17 posted on 02/18/2009 5:39:12 AM PST by hemogoblin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

18 posted on 02/18/2009 5:45:29 AM PST by Diogenesis (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal
Agree.

You don't think back-alley clinics and black-market drugs will become prevalent? Your health insurance? Useless because you'll want to pay cash and have no record kept of a lot of things. Have to look as healthy as possible for as long as possible so you look like a good financial bet for that life-saving treatment later.

What does this do to the HIV-testing privacy so closely guarded, I wonder?
19 posted on 02/18/2009 6:04:34 AM PST by JustSurrounded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

bttt


20 posted on 02/18/2009 6:35:43 AM PST by The Californian (The door to the room of success swings on the hinges of opposition. Bob Jones, Sr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson