All law is rooted in morality. We can disagree about it, but we shouldn’t paper over the differences.
Even having said that, I was under the impression that Palin was presented as an upholder of traditional Judaeo-Christian morality, even on sexual morality, as it concerns political issues, such as abstinence education.
It is not out of bounds to consider whether that commitment has indeed transferred to her daughter when Palin herself indicates that her daughter’s behaviour has compromised her credibility on the issue.
So Palin may not be a good candidate because her child(ren) may disagree with her? Because Sarah didn't teach Bristol properly (according to your definition of proper)?
O.K. I have two questions. Do you have children? And, do they agree with you on every issue?