Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye

“Projection.”

Most of it comes out that way, yes.

A lot of posters don’t seem to hold to the traditional understanding of premarital sex as immoral, but want to consider themselves champions of conservatism.


374 posted on 02/17/2009 10:13:10 PM PST by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies ]


To: Philo-Junius; rintense
A lot of posters don’t seem to hold to the traditional understanding of premarital sex as immoral, but want to consider themselves champions of conservatism.

And therein lies your misunderstanding. Political conservatism, which is the focus of this site, is just that: political. Premarital sex as immoral (or sin) is a moral/religious issue, not a political one.

Do people with similar beliefs often overlap convictions on the subject? Yes. However, championing political conservatism does not, in an absolute matter, include making religious or moral judgements about others personal lives.

390 posted on 02/17/2009 10:33:06 PM PST by TexasNative2000 (Obamamania - not terminal, but, sadly, it does have to run its four-year course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson