There is more dishonesty on your part. You take the whole thing out of context.
VAN SUSTEREN: So it's not just an issue of abstinence. That's one issue. But once we get beyond that -- you know, because when you have the discussion of abstinence, it's almost -- I always sort of feel badly because there's a wonderful child here and talking abstinence sounds -- I mean, it sounds...SARAH PALIN: (INAUDIBLE) naive (INAUDIBLE)
Obviously, to someone familiar with the transcript, the comment "naive" was in response to the context Greta set up. That being the context of talking about abstinence in the presence of a life that would not exist if Bristol had been abstinent. Greta was making a stupid point but that was the context and you just twisted it into something it wasn't.
Are you honest about anything? You sure as heck aren't one to be pointing fingers about morality.
I already posted that quote. The context is exactly what I said it was: the Bristol pregnancy made Sarah Palin’s discussion of abstinence sound naive.
Tell me more about dishonesty, you seem to be an authority.
I agree with your point completely. It looked bad and the media played it up to the hilt. It reminded me of Cheney's daughter and how they were put in a corner on marriage. I do like Palin but we have to be realistic.
I ran into TigersEye before. He is a Hannity-bot, completely programmed as “a great american” and incapable of independent thought. If you contradict his programming he insults you.
Dont let yourself be intimidated. Robotic thought is how R party got here.