Skip to comments.
SEC charges Stanford with fraud(suspiciously consistent high return)
FT ^
| 02/17/09
| Stacy-Marie Ishmael
Posted on 02/17/2009 9:23:15 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
SEC charges Stanford with fraud
By Stacy-Marie Ishmael in New York
Published: February 17 2009 17:02 | Last updated: February 17 2009 17:02
The Securities and Exchange Commission on Tuesday charged Sir Robert Allen Stanford, the billionaire Texan businessmen, of a massive, ongoing fraud through his Antigua-based offshore bank.
Stanford International Bank, located in St Johns on the Caribbean island of Antigua, has been the focal point of much controversy in recent weeks, sparked in part by a analyst note that was highly critical of the banks apparent ability to deliver consistently and significantly market beating returns on its $8.5bn portfolio of depositors assets.
(Excerpt) Read more at ft.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: allenstanford; fbi; sec; stanford
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Mini Madoff found?
To: TigerLikesRooster; PAR35; AndyJackson; Thane_Banquo; nicksaunt; MadLibDisease; happygrl; ...
2
posted on
02/17/2009 9:23:43 AM PST
by
TigerLikesRooster
(kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Where are we going, and how did I get in this handbasket?
3
posted on
02/17/2009 9:27:04 AM PST
by
villagerjoel
("Gun control is a prerequisite for genocide." - Unknown)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Tip of the iceberg, I’ll bet.
4
posted on
02/17/2009 9:31:07 AM PST
by
NonValueAdded
(May God save America from its government)
To: TigerLikesRooster
And I had always heard it was a GREAT University.
Oh well...
;^)
5
posted on
02/17/2009 9:35:52 AM PST
by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
To: TigerLikesRooster
At this point, the SEC has 600 investigations that are on-going. This company is not the last.
To: NonValueAdded
Tip of the iceberg, Ill bet. No doubt about it. All these investment banking firms are nothing but giant corporations designed to transfer money amongst themselves. How people (Rush Limbaugh) can defend these scum is beyond me.
7
posted on
02/17/2009 9:38:05 AM PST
by
oldvike
To: TigerLikesRooster
You haven’t seen nothing yet. Wait to the Gov’t starts going over the Banks books. Look out.
8
posted on
02/17/2009 9:38:09 AM PST
by
BGHater
(Tyranny is always better organised than freedom)
To: oldvike
How people (Rush Limbaugh) can defend these scum is beyond me. I must have missed that show...
9
posted on
02/17/2009 9:41:47 AM PST
by
TankerKC
(Yes we can? I already could.)
To: TankerKC
He's mentioned it on several occasions how folks are being unfairly judgemental of the bigwhigs and underlings at places like GS, Lehmen Brothers, etc...
It really caught me by suprise but he's taken up for them on numerous occasions.
10
posted on
02/17/2009 9:43:54 AM PST
by
oldvike
To: BGHater
.with the federal government being the king of all ponzi schemes itself.
11
posted on
02/17/2009 9:44:24 AM PST
by
lainie
(The US congress is full to the brim of absolutely disgusting thieves who deserve humiliating ouster.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
suspiciously consistent high returnYou mean, like cattle futures?
12
posted on
02/17/2009 9:45:13 AM PST
by
ProfoundMan
(RightyPics.com)
To: oldvike
He's mentioned it on several occasions how folks are being unfairly judgemental of the bigwhigs and underlings at places like GS, Lehmen Brothers, etc... It really caught me by suprise but he's taken up for them on numerous occasions. How does that relate to this individual who may have done something illegal?
13
posted on
02/17/2009 9:48:45 AM PST
by
TankerKC
(Yes we can? I already could.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
What?!? You mean there’s more? /sarcasm Thanks for posting.
14
posted on
02/17/2009 9:52:47 AM PST
by
PGalt
To: TankerKC
I’m sure ALL these firms could be investigated and found to be doing illegal acts. The governemnt just decides to give some of them passes.
15
posted on
02/17/2009 9:55:43 AM PST
by
oldvike
To: TigerLikesRooster
He lost $400K to Madoff, on top of his own fraud.
His CD rates were absurdly high - and no one could figure out how he could make money offering such rates.
As in past debt deflations, and currency dislocations (like 1973-1974), you will see a series of these frauds, shams and scams be exposed - and many of them will have been running for years and years. eg, Madoff — his scam survived the recession/downturn of 2002/2003. This trend of huge scams being exposed is one of my other indicators in history that his is not a normal recession.
16
posted on
02/17/2009 9:56:59 AM PST
by
NVDave
To: oldvike
They create NOTHING.
Wall Street is one huge fraud.
17
posted on
02/17/2009 9:57:13 AM PST
by
Boiling Pots
(Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious)
To: NVDave
Yes, history is being made.
18
posted on
02/17/2009 10:01:17 AM PST
by
TigerLikesRooster
(kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
To: oldvike; All
And many here on FR are echoing that sentiment.
Not a way to win people over for 2010.
People want justice, and rightfully so. In this case, that means people hanging on the gallows.
19
posted on
02/17/2009 10:05:37 AM PST
by
Red in Blue PA
(If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective.)
To: Boiling Pots; All
Agreed.
And little by little, people are beginning to realize this.
20
posted on
02/17/2009 10:06:07 AM PST
by
Red in Blue PA
(If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson