Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Image Is Everything
TownHall ^ | February 17, 2009 | Lorie Byrd

Posted on 02/17/2009 9:22:11 AM PST by dbz77

If you’ve heard it once, you’ve probably heard it a hundred times – in politics, perception is reality. In the age of Obama, that is more true than ever. Facts don’t always matter so much in politics. It’s more about image.

“Peter Perfect” is a reality show my family watches from time to time. The star of the show, Peter Ishkans, goes into struggling small businesses and helps them create a new look and a new marketing strategy to hopefully set them on the track to success. Ishkans sums up the philosophy behind his approach at the beginning of each show – “If you change your image, you will change your life.” The same could be said of the political world on a broader scale. If you create a successful image, you can change a country. If that country is America, you can even change the world.

A candidate with the right marketing strategy and willing outlets to broadcast that message can sell the public on just about anything. That is the reality Republicans have to recognize and address if they don’t want to remain the minority party.

Barack Obama the living, breathing human being was not elected President. Barack Obama the Messianic savior who would solve all the problems in the world was elected – along with his amorphous promise of hope and change.

Republicans have been frustrated for years by the disconnect between what voters say they believe and how they vote. On issues like partial birth abortion, immigration and gay marriage the opinions held by the majority of the public do not necessarily translate into the election of the candidates holding like views.

Public opinion polls consistently show an overwhelming majority of Americans identify themselves as “conservative,” even as recently as 2008 when Republicans, the more conservative of the two parties, suffered huge electoral losses. That the candidate with one of the most liberal voting records in the Senate was able to win the presidential election with an electorate that identifies itself as conservative shows just how little facts matter in the world of politics. Hard facts, actual votes he cast on a variety of specific issues in the Senate, could not compete with the media’s perpetuation of the non-specific message of hope and change and love and sunshine Barack Obama put forth.

Those in the media chose not to inform the electorate of Obama’s liberal voting record, or to ask him many hard questions. John McCain and too many other Republicans did not do enough to get that information to the voters. Republicans and conservative Americans are paying the price now.

If early interviews and news reports are an indication, most in the media will continue to assist President Obama as they did Candidate Obama in presenting a favorable image to the American public. Republicans can do as they have in the past and allow the media’s predetermined narrative to be fed to the public unchallenged, or they can use every opportunity they are on radio or television to give the public the facts and to argue for their conservative policy positions.

Charles Krauthammer wrote about how little attention the “near-miracle abroad” drew from the media when Iraq recently held provincial elections with no violence and little U.S. involvement. The new facts on the ground in Iraq over the past few years did not match the image of the situation in Iraq the Democrats and so many in the media worked so hard to create and maintain. When the situation on the ground in Iraq began to change and progress could be seen, those in the media no longer found the story worthy of much attention and Republicans were not successful in getting that information to the public.

Good economic news during the Bush years was often downplayed or ignored as well. When Democrats blamed a slow economy on the Bush tax cuts rather than on spending, those in the media did not report to the public that tax revenues had actually increased. Again, Republicans were not successful in getting that information to the people.

In the past few weeks, Democrats have attempted to sell the biggest spending bill in the history of the world under the name of “stimulus” and the media have been largely willing to help them. But this time Republicans were determined to put forth their own message – one of fiscal conservatism. Much of the information about the true nature of the so-called “stimulus” bill made it to the public and the reaction measured through telephone calls and faxes to Congress was amazing. A poll released this week by Rasmussen showed that only 38 percent of Americans believe the bill will help the economy, while 53 percent believe it will either hurt the economy or have no impact.

Hopefully Republicans have learned that when they stick to their conservative principles and speak out forcefully, Americans will hear their message. After all, most Americans identify themselves as conservative.

Over the next few years Democrats, led by President Obama and aided by their friends in the media, will continue to sell the stimulus bill. If the economy improves, the bill will receive all the credit whether it had a positive impact or not.. If the economy does not improve promptly, the message Democrats will sell to the public will likely be that additional spending and government control are needed. If Republicans fail to loudly and forcefully present their message, and to relay facts the media doesn’t choose to report, not only will Republicans lose big in the next election, but the country will too.

Republicans have suffered over the past few elections because on some issues they abandoned their conservative principles, and on others they were unable to successfully convince voters that they shared their image of what America should be. While they lost the vote on the “stimulus” bill in the Congress, the overwhelming majority of Republicans stood firm on conservative principle and won the battle in the arena of public opinion. If they continue to do that, by 2010 the number of votes they will be able to muster in the House and Senate will follow suit.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barackobama; loriebyrd; mediabias; nakedcommunist; nakedemperor; nationalization; pravdamedia
The debacle over forged memos related to president Bush's Texas Air National Guard service is proof that the media is biased against Republicans.
1 posted on 02/17/2009 9:22:11 AM PST by dbz77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dbz77

The only thing that can happen to change the dynamic is that the media needs to feel personally burned by the president and the democrats in a way that makes them suspicious for decades to come.


2 posted on 02/17/2009 9:46:59 AM PST by johnnycap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dbz77

>The debacle over forged memos related to president Bush’s Texas Air National Guard service is proof that the media is biased against Republicans.

I tend to agree. However, I don’t care so much for a “Republican” tag; I would rather have a leader who seeks Justice.

Much of our current unrest comes from the lack of Justice; our “Political Overlords” are themselves exempt from the laws and regulations whereby the rest of us “common folk” must live. (But when was the last time you saw a politico actually go to jail for Tax fraud? Perjury? Taking bribes? “Insider Trading”? Anything?)

To further illustrate the Injustice which is being perpetrated against the people: the bailouts and stimulus packages. These reward foolish behaviors, people/organizations who squandered away their wealth/reputation/means... but they also do so at the EXPENSE of the people who were intelligent or wise about managing their resources. (It also takes from people who have no direct connection either way.)

I am inclined to agree with my Philosophy professor: Peace is not the absence of War, but the presence of Justice.
I also agree with the old Roman saying: “If you want peace, then prepare for war.”

Logically, the application of those two together is:
If you want Justice, prepare for War. (Image is NOT everything.)


3 posted on 02/17/2009 9:59:13 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnnycap

>The only thing that can happen to change the dynamic is that the media needs to feel personally burned
>by the president and the democrats in a way that makes them suspicious for decades to come.

What sort of event would have to transpire to bring that about?


4 posted on 02/17/2009 10:00:10 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

I agree with this essay. Life is a popularity contest. I think the GOP needs an image make-over, not a change in principles. We need to make the case that personal responsibility is cool and dependency is weak. The corner stones are in place; we just need to build on our foundation. Many of the principles of the AA program are applicable to our current economic crisis. We need to sell the country a 12 Step Program. Time for an intervention, but the facilitator can’t be some uptight mean person. We need to be cool. Cool is like pornography; we know it when we see it.


5 posted on 02/17/2009 10:34:08 AM PST by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: johnnycap
If David Brinkley were still around he would say it again:
"The next four years will be filled with pretty words, and pretty music, and a lot of goddamn nonsense!

I might like top call it "GDmnd near-fatal nonsense."

6 posted on 02/17/2009 11:30:49 AM PST by oyez (People! You're being pimped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
Media burned?

First they would have to admit they were wrong. That's hilarious.

7 posted on 02/17/2009 11:35:08 AM PST by oyez (People! You're being pimped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: johnnycap
I tend to think Richard Nixon was became unpopular with the media early and often. When Dick returned to active politics and won the presidency they were really steamed, their fellings about Lyndon Johnson excepted.. Even if there were no Watergate, Nixon faced a chilly press and media and would a faced a exit a la' George W. Bush

An as serious situation as Watergate faced Bill Clinton. He should of resigned, but he knew he had a friendly media, even-though he burned the a time or two, and probably could survive an impeachment.

Obama has been searing the media here and there, and I fear they have an indifference to the smell of their own burning flesh. I frankly think the last maybe Republican President the media had any feeling for was Eisenhower, but my memory goes a little fuzzy about those days and I probably thought Roy Rodgers was the CIC..Cpome to think of it, he probably wasn't popular with media either.

8 posted on 02/17/2009 12:06:18 PM PST by oyez (People! You're being pimped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dbz77
"Money quote" from the article:

Republicans can do as they have in the past and allow the media’s predetermined narrative to be fed to the public unchallenged, or they can use every opportunity they are on radio or television to give the public the facts and to argue for their conservative policy positions.

9 posted on 02/17/2009 3:59:53 PM PST by Albion Wilde ("Praise and worship" is my alternate lifestyle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson