Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jimmyray
As opposed to believing God became a man, dwelt on the earth, performed various supernatural feats, and raised his own body up from death after 3 days in the grave? Why would you (or do you?) believe that?

Can you point to any hard science that disputes that? I can show you plenty that disputes the 6000 year nonsense.

114 posted on 02/17/2009 11:06:47 AM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto
Can you point to any hard science that disputes that? I can show you plenty that disputes the 6000 year nonsense.

Yes, science conclusively shows all observed event occur due to natural processes that are observable and falsifiable. Man can't walk on water (unless frozen), man can't raise the 3 dyas dead human bodies, mand can't feed 5000 men with 5 loaves of bread and 2 fishes, and have more left over than he started with. These are called miracles, and are violations on the natural order, and thus ALL hard science (so called) refutes them.

Nevertheless, I believe the history recorded in the NT is factual and true, as well as ALL of the history in the OT. How can one choose which parts are factual and which parts are not?

How does one deal with the following?:

Exodus 20:11 For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. Therefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy.

122 posted on 02/17/2009 11:19:41 AM PST by jimmyray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson