Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Axeslinger

I don’t know alot about the economy. What I do know is that the federal government takes from the states and then the states must whore themselves to get some of it back.

If it was done the way the founders intended, then states that want government supplemented health care could have it, states that want a larger welfare state could have it. My point is that across this country, funds are used to support programs in states that are not beneficial to all states. Money must then be taken from each state to support the growing dependency on federal hand outs.

People would then have the opportunity to determine if they are happy with the way their state spends its money. Or they could move to a state that spends it the way they want. Then all of these liberal states could take in the socialists and leave the federalist states alone.

Your idea about each state paying a share to the feds raises a question. How was it done before the 16th Amendment? I am ashamed to admit I don’t know.


75 posted on 02/17/2009 9:50:00 AM PST by Jvette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Jvette

me too! It’s entirely possible/likely my “idea” is anything but original!


82 posted on 02/17/2009 10:26:30 AM PST by Axeslinger (Where has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson