Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A.Hun
I believe he would have vetoed it in a second.

You don't think it's more likely that he would have demanded that some insignificant provision be taken out of it, declare it a compromise, and then sign the bill 95 percent intact?

Look at his record as a legislator.
102 posted on 02/17/2009 8:41:52 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: mysterio; rabscuttle385

***You don’t think it’s more likely that he would have demanded that some insignificant provision be taken out of it, declare it a compromise, and then sign the bill 95 percent intact?***

That’s exactly what he would have done.


106 posted on 02/17/2009 8:46:09 AM PST by djsherin (Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: mysterio
You don't think it's more likely that he would have demanded that some insignificant provision be taken out of it, declare it a compromise, and then sign the bill 95 percent intact?

I can't say definitively....McCain has been one of the most unreliable conservatives ever. At least we would have had a chance and his stand against it does give an idea.

He didn't join Collins and Snowe when the Dems cosmetically changed porkulus.

115 posted on 02/17/2009 8:53:20 AM PST by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson